Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 2189/22 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2023:rs20230125.2bvr218922 Generato dall'IA

Interim injunctive relief against state constitutional court judgment pending final constitutional review

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 2189/22
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court rejected the applicant's request for interim relief, leaving the judgment of the Berlin Constitutional Court of 16 November 2022 in force pending the separate transmission of the reasoned decision. The case involved a constitutional complaint filed against a decision by the Berlin Constitutional Court, where the applicant sought an emergency injunction to halt the effects of that state-level ruling. The Court denied the request based on the requirements for provisional measures under § 32 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, resulting in no immediate alteration to the status quo established by the lower court.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 32 Abs. 5 Satz 2 BVerfGG; Interim injunctive relief against state constitutional court judgment pending final constitutional review: The case involved a constitutional complaint filed against a decision by the Berlin Constitutional Court, where the applicant sought an emergency injunction to halt the effects of that state-level ruling. The Court denied the request based on the requirements for provisional measures under § 32 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, resulting in no immediate alteration to the status quo established by the lower court.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedimento sommario stato d'emergenza requisito costituzionale procedimento pregiudiziale d'urgenza effetti della sentenza ricorso costituzionale all'estero

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 32 Abs. 5 Satz 2 BVerfGG
Procedural rule explicitly cited in the dispositive to mandate the separate transmission of the reasoning for the decision.
Generato dall'IA
1 BvQ 61/19
Interim relief denied where pending constitutional complaint lacks exhausted remedies and substantive reasoning
2 BvR 671/26
Denial of interim relief in constitutional complaint for failure to substantiate potential fundamental rights violation under BVerfGG
1 BvQ 66/17
Denial of interim relief due to manifest lack of substantiation of constitutional complaint
2 BvR 87/17
Denial of interim relief in constitutional complaint due to insufficient substantiation of fundamental rights violations and failure to engage with the challenged judgment
2 BvQ 55/20
Interim relief for enforcement protection proceedings dismissed for lack of substantiated constitutional merit against specific lower court decisions

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 32 Abs. 5 Satz 2 BVerfGG

Procedural rule explicitly cited in the dispositive to mandate the separate transmission of the reasoning for the decision.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Ablehnung eines Eilantrags im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren gegen das Urteil des VerfGH Berlin vom 16.11.2022 (154/21 ua) - Vorabmitteilung gem § 32 Abs 5 S 1 BVerfGG, Begründung wird nachgereicht

[TENOR]

1. Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt.

2. Die Begründung der Entscheidung wird den Beteiligten gemäß § 32 Absatz 5 Satz 2 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz gesondert übermittelt.