Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvR 2656/18, 1 BvR 78/20, 1 BvR 96/20, 1 BvR 288/20 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2022:rs20221222.1bvr265618 Generato dall'IA

Valuation of subject matter for attorney fees in constitutional complaint proceedings: application of subjective and objective significance criteria under BVerfGE 79, 365

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 2656/18, 1 BvR 78/20, 1 BvR 96/20, 1 BvR 288/20
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court’s First Senate fixed the subject matter value for legal professional fees at €1,000,000 per case for four consolidated constitutional complaint proceedings. The dispute concerned the determination of the monetary value of the subject matter of the lawyer’s activity (*Gegenstandswertfestsetzung*) in constitutional complaint proceedings, a procedural prerequisite for calculating attorney remuneration. Relying on the subjective and objective significance of the proceedings and the promotion of their subject matter through legal counsel, as established in *BVerfGE 79, 365*, the court ordered the specified valuation, effectively determining the financial basis for the lawyers' fees in these matters.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Valuation of subject matter for attorney fees in constitutional complaint proceedings: application of subjective and objective significance criteria under BVerfGE 79, 365: Unter Berücksichtigung der subjektiven und objektiven Bedeutung der Verfahren und ihrer Förderung durch die anwaltliche Tätigkeit (vgl. BVerfGE 79, 365 ) wird der Wert des Gegenstands der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit in den Verfahren jeweils auf 1.000.000 Euro (in Worten: eine Million Euro) festgesetzt.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
liquidazione degli onorari difensivi procedura di stima oggetto della lite motivazione inadeguata delle censure costituzionali decisioni incidentali corpus iuris

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 79, 365
BVerfGE 79, 365 ) wird der Wert des Gegenstands der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit in den Verfahren jeweils auf 1.000.000 Euro (in Worten: eine Million Euro) festgesetzt.
Generato dall'IA
1 BvR 249/15
Valuation of subject matter for attorney fees in constitutional complaint proceedings based on objective significance
1 BvR 3214/15
Valuation of subject matter for attorney fees in constitutional complaint proceedings based on subjective and objective significance
1 BvR 795/21
Valuation of subject matter value for attorney fees in constitutional complaints based on subjective and objective significance of proceedings
1 BvR 2103/16
Valuation of subject matter for attorney fees in constitutional complaint proceedings: reduction for procedural interim success and limited objective significance
2 BvR 1322/12, 2 BvR 1989/12
Valuation of subject matter for attorney fees in constitutional complaint proceedings

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Gegenstandswert im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren

[TENOR]

Unter Berücksichtigung der subjektiven und objektiven Bedeutung der Verfahren und ihrer Förderung durch die anwaltliche Tätigkeit (vgl. BVerfGE 79, 365 ) wird der Wert des Gegenstands der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit in den Verfahren jeweils auf 1.000.000 Euro (in Worten: eine Million Euro) festgesetzt.