Constitutional complaint against judicial decision; non-admission without reasoning under § 93d BVerfGG

The Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfG) did not admit the constitutional complaint for a decision, thereby denying the applicant relief and leaving the challenged lower court judgment in force. The case involved a constitutional complaint filed against a specific judicial decision, though the underlying subject matter and factual context are not detailed in this brief order. The Court invoked § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG to dispense with a written justification, relying on the statutory provision that allows the bench to reject non-admission applications without stating reasons when the constitutional relevance is manifestly absent or insufficient.