Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
1 BvR 2074/10 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2010:rk20100929.1bvr207410 Generato dall'IA

Tax law constitutional complaint: No violation of lawful judge rights for failure to refer to European Court of Justice

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 2074/10
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint, ruling that no violation of the right to a lawful judge under Article 101(1) Sentence 2 of the Basic Law existed. The dispute involved a tax law case where the complainant alleged that the competent authority failed to make a preliminary reference to the European Court of Justice when a question of EU law was at issue. The Court determined that this alleged failure to refer to the European Court of Justice did not constitute a violation of the constitutional guarantee against arbitrary jurisdiction, resulting in the prior administrative and judicial decisions remaining in force.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG, Artikel 101 Absatz 1 Satz 2 GG; Tax law constitutional complaint: No violation of lawful judge rights for failure to refer to European Court of Justice: The dispute involved a tax law case where the complainant alleged that the competent authority failed to make a preliminary reference to the European Court of Justice when a question of EU law was at issue. The Court determined that this alleged failure to refer to the European Court of Justice did not constitute a violation of the constitutional guarantee against arbitrary jurisdiction, resulting in the prior administrative and judicial decisions remaining in force.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
rinvio pregiudiziale autorità giudiziaria fiscale giurisdizione costituzionale reclamo amministrativo diritto delle obbligazioni diritto di rimanere

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Artikel 101 Absatz 1 Satz 2 GG

The substantive constitutional provision cited in the dispositive as the specific right alleged to be violated, which the court determined was not infringed, serving as the basis for dismissing the complaint.

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG

The procedural provision cited in the dispositive to justify the omission of a detailed written explanation for the chamber's decision.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahmebeschluss: Verfassungsbeschwerde in steuerrechtlicher Sache erfolglos - keine Verletzung von Art 101 Abs 1 S 2 GG - Tenorbegründung

[TENOR]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen, weil eine Verletzung von Artikel 101 Absatz 1 Satz 2 GG infolge einer Verkennung der Pflicht zur Vorlage an den Europäischen Gerichtshof nicht vorliegt.

Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

[GRUENDE]

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.