Constitutional complaint against municipal investment grant certification inadmissible for failure to exhaust administrative judicial remedies
Germania (DE)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Federal Constitutional Court refused to accept the constitutional complaint for a decision, thereby rejecting the appellant's challenge to a municipal certification dated April 20, 2004, regarding investment grants. The dispute centered on the validity of a certification issued by a city under the Investment Subsidy Act 1999. The complaint was deemed inadmissible because the appellant failed to exhaust the administrative court system, a mandatory prerequisite for constitutional review under Section 6, Paragraph 1, Sentence 3, Alternative 2 of the Investment Subsidy Act 1999. Consequently, the municipal certification remains in force as the constitutional court did not examine the merits or modify the lower authority's decision.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IA§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Constitutional complaint against municipal investment grant certification inadmissible for failure to exhaust administrative judicial remedies: The dispute centered on the validity of a certification issued by a city under the Investment Subsidy Act 1999. The complaint was deemed inadmissible because the appellant failed to exhaust the administrative court system, a mandatory prerequisite for constitutional review under Section 6, Paragraph 1, Sentence 3, Alternative 2 of the Investment Subsidy Act 1999. Consequently, the municipal certification remains in force as the constitutional court did not examine the merits or modify the lower authority's decision.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IACited in the dispositive as the specific statutory basis for declaring the constitutional complaint inadmissible due to the failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
Cited in the dispositive to justify the decision to refrain from providing a detailed reasoning.
Testo completo
Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung
[TENOR]
Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen, weil sie mangels Ausschöpfung des verwaltungsgerichtlichen Rechtsweges gegen die Bescheinigung der Stadt B. vom 20. April 2004 gemäß § 6 Abs. 1 Satz 3 Alternative 2 des Investitionszulagengesetzes 1999 unzulässig ist.
Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.
[GRUENDE]
Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.