Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvR 1172/21 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2021:rk20210728.1bvr117221 Generato dall'IA

Press-law constitutional complaint barred for lack of admissibility; frivolous judge recusal motion rejected

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 1172/21
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's constitutional complaint without further reasoning and rejected their motion for an interim injunction, leaving the subject matter unresolved at this level. The dispute involved a press and media law case where the applicant challenged a procedural decision by filing a recusal application against a judge. The Court held that the recusal motion was obviously inadmissible and that the constitutional complaint failed to meet the requirements for acceptance under the German Federal Constitutional Court Act, specifically lacking the prerequisites for admissibility.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG, § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG, § 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG; Press-law constitutional complaint barred for lack of admissibility; frivolous judge recusal motion rejected: The dispute involved a press and media law case where the applicant challenged a procedural decision by filing a recusal application against a judge. The Court held that the recusal motion was obviously inadmissible and that the constitutional complaint failed to meet the requirements for acceptance under the German Federal Constitutional Court Act, specifically lacking the prerequisites for admissibility.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritto di stampa domanda di ricusazione diritto processuale oggetto della lite motivazione inadeguata delle censure costituzionali diritto alla risoluzione del contratto

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG
Die Voraussetzungen des § 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG liegen nicht vor; die Verfassungsbeschwerde ist unzulässig.
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.
§ 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG
Procedural basis for declaring the application for an interim injunction moot following the non-acceptance of the constitutional complaint.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
1 BvR 1487/87
Dezember 1988 - 1 BvR 1487/87 -, juris).
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 2361/16
Inadmissibility of constitutional complaint due to unsubstantiated judge recusal motion and lack of sufficient reasoning
2 BvR 1624/22
Recusal motion and constitutional complaint rejected for lack of admissible bias grounds and insufficient legal argumentation
1 BvR 754/17
Constitutional complaint and judicial recusal dismissed for lack of adequate substantiation of bias and inadmissibility
1 BvR 1924/24
Admissibility of judicial recusal requests and non-acceptance of constitutional complaint
1 BvR 92/23
Admissibility of judicial recusal motion in hearing objection proceedings and scope of right to a lawful judge

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG

Procedural basis for declaring the application for an interim injunction moot following the non-acceptance of the constitutional complaint.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahme einer unzulässigen Verfassungsbeschwerde in einer presse- bzw medienrechtlichen Sache ohne weitere Begründung (§ 93d Abs 1 S 3 BVerfGG) - Verwerfung eines offensichtlich unzulässigen Ablehnungsgesuchs

[TENOR]

Das Ablehnungsgesuch gegen die Richterin Baer wird als unzulässig verworfen.

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.

Mit der Nichtannahme der Verfassungsbeschwerde wird der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung gegenstandslos (§ 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG).

[GRUENDE]

I. Das Ablehnungsgesuch gegen die Richterin Baer ist offensichtlich unzulässig (vgl. BVerfG, Beschluss der 1. Kammer des Ersten Senats vom 15. Dezember 1988 - 1 BvR 1487/87 -, juris).

II. Die Verfassungsbeschwerde ist nicht zur Entscheidung anzunehmen. Die Voraussetzungen des § 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG liegen nicht vor; die Verfassungsbeschwerde ist unzulässig.

Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.