Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvR 328/21 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2021:rk20210630.1bvr032821 Generato dall'IA

Constitutional complaint against state statute dissolving old-law associations barred for failure to substantiate subsidiarity principle

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 328/21
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint without oral hearing, ruling it inadmissible and leaving the challenged legislation in force. The petitioner challenged a 2020 Saxony-Anhalt statute regarding the dissolution of old-law person associations, filing a direct challenge against the law itself. The court held the complaint failed to meet the substantive reasoning requirements of § 23(1) and § 92 BVerfGG, specifically because the petitioner did not demonstrate compliance with the constitutional subsidiarity principle under § 90(2) BVerfGG, which mandates exhausting regular legal remedies before seeking constitutional review.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG, § 92 BVerfGG, § 90 Abs. 2 BVerfGG, § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Constitutional complaint against state statute dissolving old-law associations barred for failure to substantiate subsidiarity principle: The petitioner challenged a 2020 Saxony-Anhalt statute regarding the dissolution of old-law person associations, filing a direct challenge against the law itself. The court held the complaint failed to meet the substantive reasoning requirements of § 23(1) and § 92 BVerfGG, specifically because the petitioner did not demonstrate compliance with the constitutional subsidiarity principle under § 90(2) BVerfGG, which mandates exhausting regular legal remedies before seeking constitutional review.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
principio costituzionale difetto di motivazione udienza dibattimentale principio di sussidiarietà motivazione inadeguata delle censure costituzionali motivazione nel merito

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG
Annahmegründe gemäß § 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG liegen nicht vor, weil die Verfassungsbeschwerde bereits unzulässig ist.
§ 92 BVerfGG
1 Satz 2, § 92 BVerfGG insbesondere im Hinblick auf den in § 90 Abs.
§ 90 Abs. 2 BVerfGG
1 Satz 2, § 92 BVerfGG insbesondere im Hinblick auf den in § 90 Abs. 2 BVerfGG verankerten Grundsatz der Subsidiarität der Verfassungsbeschwerde nicht gerecht.
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Cited in the operative order to justify omitting a further detailed explanation for the dismissal.
Generato dall'IA
1 BvR 2397/23
Constitutional complaint dismissed for lack of subsidiarity and insufficient reasoning
1 BvR 2137/23
Constitutional complaint in social law rejected for lack of sufficient substantiation and failure to satisfy the subsidiarity principle
1 BvR 2266/16
Insufficiency of constitutional complaint relying on state case law and lacking engagement with Federal standards for unreasoned final decisions
1 BvR 471/21
Constitutional complaint rejected as manifestly inadmissible for failure to identify a concrete act of state authority and substantiate a constitutional grievance.
1 BvR 2568/24
Constitutional complaint dismissed for insufficient substantiation of lower court reasoning

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG

Cited in the operative order to justify omitting a further detailed explanation for the dismissal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahmebeschluss: Rechtssatzverfassungsbeschwerde gegen das Gesetz über die Auflösung der Personenzusammenschlüsse alten Rechts in Sachsen-Anhalt (juris: PersZSchlAuflG ST) unzulässig - mangelnde Substantiierung insb hinsichtlich des Subsidiaritätsgrundsatzes

[TENOR]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.

[GRUENDE]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde richtet sich unmittelbar gegen das Gesetz über die Auflösung der Personenzusammenschlüsse alten Rechts in Sachsen-Anhalt vom 19. November 2020 (Gesetz- und Verordnungsblatt für das Land Sachsen-Anhalt 2020 Seite 663).

Sie ist nicht zur Entscheidung anzunehmen. Annahmegründe gemäß § 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG liegen nicht vor, weil die Verfassungsbeschwerde bereits unzulässig ist. Sie wird den Begründungsanforderungen aus § 23 Abs. 1 Satz 2, § 92 BVerfGG insbesondere im Hinblick auf den in § 90 Abs. 2 BVerfGG verankerten Grundsatz der Subsidiarität der Verfassungsbeschwerde nicht gerecht.

Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.