Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvC 10/21 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2021:cs20210722.2bvc001021 Generato dall'IA

Constitutional non-recognition complaint: inadmissibility of interim relief and unreasoned pre-notification under § 96d BVerfGG

Numero d'incarto 2 BvC 10/21
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court rejected the non-recognition complaint and declared the application for interim relief inadmissible, with the reasoning to be communicated separately. The case involved a non-recognition complaint filed under § 13 No. 3a of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, challenging a lower court's denial of legal standing or recognition in a constitutional dispute, alongside a request for an interim order. The decisive legal basis comprised the Court's jurisdictional authority under Article 93(1) No. 4c of the Basic Law, its power to dismiss complaints without prior reasoning under § 96d Sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, and the finding that the application for interim measures was procedurally inadmissible.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 96d Satz 2 BVerfGG; Constitutional non-recognition complaint: inadmissibility of interim relief and unreasoned pre-notification under § 96d BVerfGG: The case involved a non-recognition complaint filed under § 13 No. 3a of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, challenging a lower court's denial of legal standing or recognition in a constitutional dispute, alongside a request for an interim order. The decisive legal basis comprised the Court's jurisdictional authority under Article 93(1) No. 4c of the Basic Law, its power to dismiss complaints without prior reasoning under § 96d Sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, and the finding that the application for interim measures was procedurally inadmissible.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedimento sommario motivazione inadeguata delle censure costituzionali decisioni incidentali riconoscimento di uno Stato notificazione della decisione costituzionalità delle leggi

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 96d Satz 2 BVerfGG
Procedural rule cited in the dispositive to justify the communication of the decision without a written reasoning.
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 991/18
Inadmissibility of constitutional complaint for interim relief due to failure to request suspension of effect in administrative proceedings
2 BvQ 31/17
Denial of interim relief where underlying constitutional complaint is inadmissible due to unexhausted ordinary judicial remedies
2 BvC 2/21
Inadmissibility of non-recognition complaint due to failure to meet pleading requirements and inability to cure pre-deadline defects in party recognition.
1 BvQ 4/17
Inadmissibility of objection to interim relief denial where only a constitutional complaint is admissible in the main proceedings
1 BvQ 85/23
Inadmissibility of interim constitutional relief for failure to substantiate the main complaint and submit challenged decisions

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 96d Satz 2 BVerfGG

Procedural rule cited in the dispositive to justify the communication of the decision without a written reasoning.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Zurückweisung einer Nichtanerkennungsbeschwerde (Art 93 Abs 1 Nr 4c GG, § 13 Nr 3a BVerfGG) - Vorabmitteilung der Entscheidung ohne Begründung (§ 96d S 2 BVerfGG) - Eilantrag unstatthaft

[TENOR]

Die Nichtanerkennungsbeschwerde wird zurückgewiesen.

Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung ist unstatthaft.

Die Begründung wird gesondert übermittelt (§ 96d Satz 2 BVerfGG).