Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvR 530/21 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2021:rk20210421.1bvr053021 Generato dall'IA

Denial of cost reimbursement in constitutional complaint proceedings for lack of special equitable grounds

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 530/21
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's request for an advance of costs (Auslagenerstattung), upholding the underlying order that declined to take up the constitutional complaint for decision. Following the dismissal of the complaint and the lapse of a pending application for interim relief, the applicant sought cost reimbursement pursuant to Section 34a in conjunction with Section 91a of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Court held that the applicant failed to demonstrate the special equitable grounds required by Section 34a Paragraph 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act for granting such an advance. The decision is final and non-appealable.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 34a BVerfGG, § 91a ZPO, § 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG; Denial of cost reimbursement in constitutional complaint proceedings for lack of special equitable grounds: Following the dismissal of the complaint and the lapse of a pending application for interim relief, the applicant sought cost reimbursement pursuant to Section 34a in conjunction with Section 91a of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Court held that the applicant failed to demonstrate the special equitable grounds required by Section 34a Paragraph 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act for granting such an advance. The decision is final and non-appealable.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
anticipo delle spese rimborso delle spese procedura pendente codice di diritto processuale civile motivazione inadeguata delle censure costituzionali procedimento sommario

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 34a BVerfGG
April 2021 die Erstattung von Kosten gemäß "§ 34a BVerfGG i.V.m.
§ 91a ZPO
§ 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG
The court expressly identified the applicant's request as one for an advance of costs under this provision and dismissed it because the special equitable grounds required by the norm were not demonstrated.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 74, 218
BVerfGE 74, 218 ) sind jedoch weder dargelegt noch ersichtlich.
Generato dall'IA
1 BvR 2500/15
Reimbursement of constitutional complaint costs under § 34a BVerfGG requires special equity grounds
2 BvR 410/25
Reimbursement of litigation expenses in non-admissible constitutional complaints: requirement of special equitable grounds
2 BvR 1903/15
Reimbursement of legal expenses after non-acceptance of constitutional complaint: failure to prove exceptional grounds of equity under § 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG
2 BvR 2128/18
Reimbursement of costs for unsuccessful constitutional complaint under § 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG requiring special equity grounds
1 BvR 796/14
Denial of reimbursement for litigation expenses of non-admitted constitutional complaint and rejected interim relief based on Billigkeit under § 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG

The court expressly identified the applicant's request as one for an advance of costs under this provision and dismissed it because the special equitable grounds required by the norm were not demonstrated.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Ablehnung der Auslagenerstattung nach Nichtannahme der Verfassungsbeschwerde

[TENOR]

Der Antrag des Beschwerdeführers auf Auslagenerstattung wird abgelehnt.

[GRUENDE]

Nachdem die Verfassungsbeschwerde durch Beschluss vom 23. März 2021 nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen und der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung gegenstandslos wurde, hat der Beschwerdeführer mit Schreiben vom 1. April 2021 die Erstattung von Kosten gemäß "§ 34a BVerfGG i.V.m. § 91a ZPO" beantragt. Der Antrag ist als Antrag auf Auslagenerstattung nach § 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG auszulegen. Die für eine Auslagenerstattung erforderlichen besonderen Billigkeitsgründe (vgl. BVerfGE 74, 218 ) sind jedoch weder dargelegt noch ersichtlich.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.