Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvQ 48/21 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2021:qk20210417.1bvq004821 Generato dall'IA

Constitutional complaint against assembly ban; insufficient substantiation of urgent interim relief requirements

Numero d'incarto 1 BvQ 48/21
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court denied the applicant's urgent application for an interim order, meaning the challenged assembly ban remains in force and the applicant prevailed in no respect. The dispute concerned a request for urgent relief to annul a prohibition of a public assembly, where the applicant sought to halt the ban's enforcement pending a final decision. The court rejected the motion solely on procedural grounds, holding that the applicant failed to adequately substantiate the prerequisites for an interim order as required by § 32 Abs. 1 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), rendering the decision final and unappealable.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 32 Abs. 1 BVerfGG; Constitutional complaint against assembly ban; insufficient substantiation of urgent interim relief requirements: The dispute concerned a request for urgent relief to annul a prohibition of a public assembly, where the applicant sought to halt the ban's enforcement pending a final decision. The court rejected the motion solely on procedural grounds, holding that the applicant failed to adequately substantiate the prerequisites for an interim order as required by § 32 Abs. 1 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), rendering the decision final and unappealable.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
requisito costituzionale procedimento sommario ragione di polizia autorizzazione all’esecuzione eccezione di incostituzionalità procedimento pregiudiziale d'urgenza

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 32 Abs. 1 BVerfGG
Cited in the dispositive as the basis for rejecting the application for an interim order due to insufficient substantiation of the legal prerequisites.
Generato dall'IA
1 BvR 1005/20
Constitutional complaint challenging a public assembly ban: denial of interim relief due to failure to exhaust administrative court emergency remedies
1 BvQ 130/20
Constitutional interim relief against assembly ban denied for failure to exhaust administrative court remedies
1 BvQ 147/20
Interim relief against assembly ban: sufficiency of substantiation under § 32(1) BVerfGG
1 BvR 742/20
Rejection of interim relief for assembly ban due to lack of demonstrated ongoing legal interest after partial passage of event duration
1 BvQ 27/20
Denial of interim assembly exemption due to unresolved administrative judicial remedy

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 32 Abs. 1 BVerfGG

Cited in the dispositive as the basis for rejecting the application for an interim order due to insufficient substantiation of the legal prerequisites.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Erfolgloser Eilantrag auf Aufhebung eines Versammlungsverbots - Voraussetzungen für Erlass einer eA nicht hinreichend dargelegt - Tenorbegründung

[TENOR]

Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt, weil die Voraussetzungen des § 32 Abs. 1 BVerfGG vom Antragsteller nicht ausreichend dargetan sind.

[GRUENDE]

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.