Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 2061/19 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2021:rk20210517.2bvr206119 Generato dall'IA

Interim injunction repetition: suspension of custodial sentence execution pending constitutional complaint

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 2061/19
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The German Federal Constitutional Court (Second Senate, First Chamber) ordered the repetition of a previously issued interim injunction, suspending the execution of a custodial sentence pending the final decision on the constitutional complaint, with a maximum duration of six months; the applicant prevailed in maintaining this suspension. The dispute concerned the enforcement of a custodial sentence imposed by the Essen District Court in 2017, subject to a prior appeal by the Federal Court of Justice, where the applicant challenged the continued execution of the sentence as a violation of fundamental rights. The Court applied § 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG, determining that the statutory prerequisites for the initial interim relief remained valid, thereby justifying the extension of the stay of execution without requiring a new substantive assessment beyond the reasoning of the original December 2019 order.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG; Interim injunction repetition: suspension of custodial sentence execution pending constitutional complaint: The dispute concerned the enforcement of a custodial sentence imposed by the Essen District Court in 2017, subject to a prior appeal by the Federal Court of Justice, where the applicant challenged the continued execution of the sentence as a violation of fundamental rights. The Court applied § 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG, determining that the statutory prerequisites for the initial interim relief remained valid, thereby justifying the extension of the stay of execution without requiring a new substantive assessment beyond the reasoning of the original December 2019 order.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
pena privativa della libertà differimento dell'esecuzione della pena procedimento sommario autorizzazione all’esecuzione diritto di rimanere durata del soggiorno

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG
Procedural provision cited in the dispositive to authorize the repetition of the interim injunction for a maximum duration of six months.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
4 StR 561/17
Criminal breach of trust via fraudulently inflated consulting fees and fictitious invoices violating statutory duties of economic efficiency
BVerfGE 21, 50
BVerfGE 21, 50; 89, 113 ; 97, 102 ).
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 829/24
Repetition of interim order suspending execution of custodial sentence pending constitutional complaint
2 BvR 2628/10
Repetition of interim suspension of custodial sentence execution

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG

Procedural provision cited in the dispositive to authorize the repetition of the interim injunction for a maximum duration of six months.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Dritte Wiederholung einer einstweiligen Anordnung: Vorläufige Aussetzung der Vollstreckung einer Freiheitsstrafe

[TENOR]

Die einstweilige Anordnung vom 10. Dezember 2019, wiederholt mit Beschlüssen vom 3. Juni 2020 und 26. November 2020, wird bis zu einer Entscheidung über die Verfassungsbeschwerde, längstens für die Dauer von sechs Monaten, wiederholt (§ 32 Abs. 6 Satz 2 BVerfGG).

[GRUENDE]

I. Das Bundesverfassungsgericht hat durch einstweilige Anordnung vom 10. Dezember 2019 die Vollstreckung der Freiheitsstrafe des Beschwerdeführers aus dem Urteil des Landgerichts Essen vom 8. Juni 2017 - 32 KLs 6/16 - nach Maßgabe des Beschlusses des Bundesgerichtshofs vom 20. Juni 2018 - 4 StR 561/17 - bis zur Entscheidung über die Verfassungsbeschwerde des Beschwerdeführers in der Hauptsache ausgesetzt und die einstweilige Anordnung mit Beschlüssen vom 3. Juni 2020 und 26. November 2020 wiederholt.

II. Das Bundesverfassungsgericht kann eine einstweilige Anordnung dann wiederholen, wenn die gesetzlichen Voraussetzungen für den erstmaligen Erlass einer solchen Anordnung noch gegeben sind (vgl. BVerfGE 21, 50; 89, 113 ; 97, 102 ). Dies ist vorliegend der Fall. Zur Begründung wird auf den Beschluss vom 10. Dezember 2019 verwiesen.