Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 1547/20 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2021:rk20210315.2bvr154720 Generato dall'IA

Non-prosecution enforcement: inadmissibility of constitutional complaint due to failure to exhaust ordinary criminal review remedies

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 1547/20
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint as inadmissible without deciding on the pending request for reinstatement of the deadline. The dispute concerned a criminal procedure challenge against a decision by the General Public Prosecutor's Office regarding a failure to file a public prosecution complaint (Klageerzwingung). The court held that the complaint failed to satisfy the principle of subsidiarity required for constitutional review because the petitioner had not exhausted the ordinary legal remedies available under criminal procedure law, specifically by failing to file an application for judicial review or pursue the private prosecution route. Additionally, the complaint was found insufficiently reasoned under the applicable rules for justifying constitutional complaints.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG, § 90 Abs. 2 BVerfGG, § 172 Abs. 2 Satz 1 StPO, § 172 Abs. 2 Satz 3 StPO, § 92 BVerfGG, § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Non-prosecution enforcement: inadmissibility of constitutional complaint due to failure to exhaust ordinary criminal review remedies: The dispute concerned a criminal procedure challenge against a decision by the General Public Prosecutor's Office regarding a failure to file a public prosecution complaint (Klageerzwingung). The court held that the complaint failed to satisfy the principle of subsidiarity required for constitutional review because the petitioner had not exhausted the ordinary legal remedies available under criminal procedure law, specifically by failing to file an application for judicial review or pursue the private prosecution route. Additionally, the complaint was found insufficiently reasoned under the applicable rules for justifying constitutional complaints.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
sindacato giurisdizionale motivazione inadeguata delle censure costituzionali denuncia penale principio costituzionale decisione d'esecuzione azione penale privata

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG
Legal basis for the decision not to accept the constitutional complaint for decision due to its inadmissibility.
§ 90 Abs. 2 BVerfGG
Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird dem Grundsatz der Subsidiarität der Verfassungsbeschwerde nicht gerecht (§ 90 Abs. 2 BVerfGG).
§ 172 Abs. 2 Satz 1 StPO
Juni 2020 - trotz entsprechender Rechtsmittelbelehrung - keinen Antrag auf gerichtliche Entscheidung (§ 172 Abs. 2 Satz 1 StPO) gestellt beziehungsweise nicht den Privatklageweg (§ 172 Abs.
§ 172 Abs. 2 Satz 3 StPO
2 Satz 1 StPO) gestellt beziehungsweise nicht den Privatklageweg (§ 172 Abs. 2 Satz 3 StPO) beschritten hat.
§ 92 BVerfGG
1 Satz 2 Halbsatz 1, § 92 BVerfGG an ihre Begründung.
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Procedural rule cited to justify the omission of a further detailed reasoning in the order.
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 604/19
Inadmissibility of constitutional complaint in prosecution compulsion for failure to exhaust legal remedies via motion for hearing
2 BvR 1948/20
Inadmissibility of constitutional complaint for failure to substantiate specific fundamental rights violation against ordinary law application
2 BvR 229/19
Constitutional complaint inadmissible for failure to exhaust recusal remedies in criminal proceedings
2 BvR 199/16
Inadmissibility of constitutional complaint for failure to file hearing objection in criminal enforcement proceedings
2 BvR 1312/12
Inadmissibility of constitutional complaint for failure to exhaust legal remedies by filing a motion for review of hearing errors

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG

Legal basis for the decision not to accept the constitutional complaint for decision due to its inadmissibility.

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG

Procedural rule cited to justify the omission of a further detailed reasoning in the order.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahme einer mangels Rechtswegerschöpfung unzulässigen Verfassungsbeschwerde in einer Klageerzwingungssache

[TENOR]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird, ohne dass es einer Entscheidung über den Antrag auf Wiedereinsetzung in den vorigen Stand bedarf, nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.

[GRUENDE]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde ist, ohne dass es einer Entscheidung über die Wiedereinsetzung in den vorigen Stand bedarf, nicht zur Entscheidung anzunehmen (§ 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG), weil sie unzulässig ist.

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird dem Grundsatz der Subsidiarität der Verfassungsbeschwerde nicht gerecht (§ 90 Abs. 2 BVerfGG). Der Beschwerdeführer hat den fachgerichtlichen Rechtsweg nicht erschöpft, da er gegen den angegriffenen Bescheid der Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Celle vom 4. Juni 2020 - trotz entsprechender Rechtsmittelbelehrung - keinen Antrag auf gerichtliche Entscheidung (§ 172 Abs. 2 Satz 1 StPO) gestellt beziehungsweise nicht den Privatklageweg (§ 172 Abs. 2 Satz 3 StPO) beschritten hat.

Sie genügt überdies nicht den Anforderungen der § 23 Abs. 1 Satz 2 Halbsatz 1, § 92 BVerfGG an ihre Begründung.

Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.