Interim relief against assembly ban: sufficiency of substantiation under § 32(1) BVerfGG
Germania (DE)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's request for interim relief, finding that the statutory prerequisites were not sufficiently substantiated; consequently, the challenged assembly ban remains in effect. The dispute concerned a preliminary application for an interim order challenging a ban on a public assembly. The decisive legal basis for the rejection was Section 32(1) of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which requires a detailed demonstration of the requirements for interim relief; the court held that the applicant failed to provide adequate reasoning to meet this burden.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IA§ 32 Abs. 1 BVerfGG; Interim relief against assembly ban: sufficiency of substantiation under § 32(1) BVerfGG: The dispute concerned a preliminary application for an interim order challenging a ban on a public assembly. The decisive legal basis for the rejection was Section 32(1) of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which requires a detailed demonstration of the requirements for interim relief; the court held that the applicant failed to provide adequate reasoning to meet this burden.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAProvision cited as the basis for rejecting the request for interim relief due to insufficient substantiation of the statutory prerequisites.
Testo completo
Eilantrag gegen Versammlungsverbot erfolglos - unzureichende Antragsbegründung - Tenorbegründung
[TENOR]
Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt, weil die Voraussetzungen des § 32 Abs. 1 BVerfGG vom Antragsteller nicht ausreichend dargetan sind.
[GRUENDE]
Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.