Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvQ 152/20, 1 BvQ 153/20, 1 BvQ 154/20, 1 BvQ 155/20, 1 BvQ 156/20, 1 BvQ 157/20 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2020:qk20201229.1bvq015220 Generato dall'IA

Interim injunctions against entry into force of the Occupational Safety Control Act

Numero d'incarto 1 BvQ 152/20, 1 BvQ 153/20, 1 BvQ 154/20, 1 BvQ 155/20, 1 BvQ 156/20, 1 BvQ 157/20
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The German Federal Constitutional Court rejected the applications for interim injunctions, with the applicants prevailing in neither the immediate procedural outcome nor the underlying challenge. The dispute concerned the entry into force of specific provisions of the Occupational Safety Control Act (Arbeitsschutzkontrollgesetz), with the applicants seeking a provisional halt to the legislative changes through an urgent constitutional complaint procedure. The Court ordered the rejection of the requests under § 32 Abs. 5 S. 1 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), meaning the challenged statutory provisions remained in effect without a suspensive order, and the full reasoning for this decision was to be communicated separately rather than published in the operative text.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 32 Abs. 5 Satz 2 BVerfGG; Interim injunctions against entry into force of the Occupational Safety Control Act: The dispute concerned the entry into force of specific provisions of the Occupational Safety Control Act (Arbeitsschutzkontrollgesetz), with the applicants seeking a provisional halt to the legislative changes through an urgent constitutional complaint procedure. The Court ordered the rejection of the requests under § 32 Abs. 5 S. 1 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), meaning the challenged statutory provisions remained in effect without a suspensive order, and the full reasoning for this decision was to be communicated separately rather than published in the operative text.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
sicurezza del lavoro entrata in vigore "Validità provvisoria" atto processuale motivi di sicurezza diritto industriale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 32 Abs. 5 Satz 2 BVerfGG
Procedural rule applied in the dispositive to state that the reasoning for the rejection of the interim injunction applications will be communicated separately.
Generato dall'IA
1 BvQ 165/20, 1 BvQ 166/20, 1 BvQ 167/20
Interim relief to suspend entry into force of Occupational Safety Supervision Act amendments
1 BvR 842/17
Inapplicability of interim suspension to strike-breaking ban in agency employment law
2 BvQ 39/16
Insufficient substantiation of isolated interim injunction application and failure to demonstrate admissibility of main constitutional complaint

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 32 Abs. 5 Satz 2 BVerfGG

Procedural rule applied in the dispositive to state that the reasoning for the rejection of the interim injunction applications will be communicated separately.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Erfolglose Eilanträge betreffend das Inkrafttreten von Teilen des Arbeitsschutzkontrollgesetzes - Bekanntgabe der Entscheidung ohne Begründung gem § 32 Abs 5 S 1 BVerfGG

[TENOR]

Die Anträge auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung werden abgelehnt.

[GRUENDE]

Die Begründung der Entscheidung wird gemäß § 32 Abs. 5 Satz 2 BVerfGG gesondert übermittelt.