Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
2 BvR 1845/18 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2020:rk20200305.2bvr184518 Generato dall'IA

Suspension of extradition to Romania for criminal prosecution pending constitutional review

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 1845/18
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The German Federal Constitutional Court (Second Senate, Second Chamber) extended its previous provisional order, suspending the surrender of the complainant to Romanian authorities for criminal prosecution for a period of up to six months, pending the final decision on the constitutional complaint. The case involves a constitutional complaint challenging the execution of an extradition or surrender order against a Romanian national, where the court had previously issued and repeatedly extended a stay of the surrender proceedings. The court reaffirmed the provisional stay, citing that the statutory preconditions for the initial order remained satisfied, and explicitly noted that the enforcement of the underlying detention for extradition purposes remains unaffected by this protective measure. The decision relies on § 32(6) sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG) regarding the repetition of provisional orders and established case law requiring that the conditions for the initial grant of interim relief must still persist for its extension.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 32 Absatz 6 Satz 2 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz; Suspension of extradition to Romania for criminal prosecution pending constitutional review: The case involves a constitutional complaint challenging the execution of an extradition or surrender order against a Romanian national, where the court had previously issued and repeatedly extended a stay of the surrender proceedings. The court reaffirmed the provisional stay, citing that the statutory preconditions for the initial order remained satisfied, and explicitly noted that the enforcement of the underlying detention for extradition purposes remains unaffected by this protective measure. The decision relies on § 32(6) sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG) regarding the repetition of provisional orders and established case law requiring that the conditions for the initial grant of interim relief must still persist for its extension.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
arresto in vista d'estradizione estensione della procedura sospensione provvisionale sospensione di pena sospensione dell'esecuzione azione penale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 32 Absatz 6 Satz 2 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz
Procedural rule cited in the dispositive to legally authorize the repetition of the provisional order for a period of up to six months.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 21, 50
BVerfGE 21, 50; 89, 113 ; 97, 102 ).
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 32 Absatz 6 Satz 2 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz

Procedural rule cited in the dispositive to legally authorize the repetition of the provisional order for a period of up to six months.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Erneute Wiederholung einer einstweiligen Anordnung: einstweilige Untersagung der Auslieferung eines Rumänen nach Rumänien zur Strafverfolgung

[TENOR]

Die einstweilige Anordnung vom 24. August 2018, wiederholt mit Beschlüssen vom 1. Oktober 2018, vom 3. April 2019 und vom 26. September 2019, wird bis zu einer Entscheidung über die Verfassungsbeschwerde, längstens für die Dauer von sechs Monaten, wiederholt (§ 32 Absatz 6 Satz 2 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz).

[GRUENDE]

I. Das Bundesverfassungsgericht hat durch einstweilige Anordnung vom 24. August 2018 die Übergabe des Beschwerdeführers an die rumänischen Behörden bis zur Entscheidung über die Verfassungsbeschwerde, längstens für die Dauer von sechs Monaten, einstweilen ausgesetzt und die einstweilige Anordnung mit Beschlüssen vom 1. Oktober 2018, vom 3. April 2019 und vom 26. September 2019 wiederholt.

II. Das Bundesverfassungsgericht kann eine einstweilige Anordnung dann wiederholen, wenn die gesetzlichen Voraussetzungen für den erstmaligen Erlass einer solchen Anordnung noch gegeben sind (vgl. BVerfGE 21, 50; 89, 113 ; 97, 102 ). Dies ist vorliegend der Fall. Zur Begründung wird auf den Beschluss vom 1. Oktober 2018 verwiesen.

III. Die Vollziehung der Auslieferungshaft bleibt von der einstweiligen Anordnung unberührt.