Constitutional complaint for lack of exhaustion of legal remedies filed before decision on hearing objection
Germania (DE)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Federal Constitutional Court rejected the complainant's application for reimbursement of necessary expenses and denied legal aid, effectively leaving the unmerited constitutional complaint and the underlying administrative litigation proceedings unaffected. The dispute arose when a complainant filed a constitutional complaint against a lower court's handling of a hearing objection (Anhörungsrüge) before the administrative court had issued a decision on that objection. The court held the complaint inadmissible because the statutory exhaustion of legal remedies had not been met under § 90(2) Sentence 1 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), as the complainant failed to demonstrate that a serious and unavoidable disadvantage would have resulted had the legal path been exhausted first. Consequently, the denial of legal aid was justified under § 114(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), which requires an expectation of success for such grants.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IA§ 90 Absatz 2 Satz 1 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz, § 114 Absatz 1 Zivilprozessordnung; Constitutional complaint for lack of exhaustion of legal remedies filed before decision on hearing objection: The dispute arose when a complainant filed a constitutional complaint against a lower court's handling of a hearing objection (Anhörungsrüge) before the administrative court had issued a decision on that objection. The court held the complaint inadmissible because the statutory exhaustion of legal remedies had not been met under § 90(2) Sentence 1 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), as the complainant failed to demonstrate that a serious and unavoidable disadvantage would have resulted had the legal path been exhausted first. Consequently, the denial of legal aid was justified under § 114(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), which requires an expectation of success for such grants.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAMain ground for declaring the constitutional complaint inadmissible due to the lack of exhaustion of legal remedies.
Provision applied to justify the denial of legal aid because the complaint had no prospect of success.
Testo completo
Ablehnung der Auslagenerstattung im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren: Unzulässigkeit der Verfassungsbeschwerde bei Beschwerdeerhebung vor fachgerichtlicher Entscheidung über Anhörungsrüge - Tenorbegründung
[TENOR]
Der Antrag des Beschwerdeführers auf Erstattung seiner notwendigen Auslagen vom 7. August 2019 wird abgelehnt. Die Verfassungsbeschwerde war unzulässig, weil der Rechtsweg noch nicht erschöpft war, § 90 Absatz 2 Satz 1 Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz. Der Beschwerdeführer hat die Verfassungsbeschwerde erhoben, bevor das Verwaltungsgericht über die eingelegte Anhörungsrüge entschieden hatte. Gründe dafür, dass ihm bei Erschöpfung des Rechtswegs ein schwerer und unabwendbarer Nachteil entstanden wäre, hat er nicht vorgetragen.
Der Prozesskostenhilfeantrag wird abgelehnt. Wegen der fehlenden Rechtswegerschöpfung hatte die erhobene Verfassungsbeschwerde keine Aussicht auf Erfolg, § 114 Absatz 1 Zivilprozessordnung.
[GRUENDE]
Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.