Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 1464/19 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2019:rk20190815.2bvr146419 Generato dall'IA

Extradition-related interim relief denied for insufficient substantiation of disproportionate interference with Article 6(1) Basic Law family rights

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 1464/19
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The German Federal Constitutional Court (Second Senate, Second Chamber) rejected the application for interim relief, ruling that the applicant had failed to substantiate that their pending constitutional complaint was not inadmissible or manifestly unfounded. The case involved a challenge to an extradition matter, where the applicant argued that holding a non-German national criminally liable outside the national territory violated their right to family life. The court held that Article 6(1) of the Basic Law generally does not protect against such extraterritorial criminal liability, and the applicant had not sufficiently demonstrated any disproportionate interference with this fundamental right based on the specific circumstances of the individual case in either the ordinary jurisdictional proceedings or the constitutional court procedure.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art 6 Abs 1 GG, § 93 Absatz 1 Satz 1 BVerfGG; Extradition-related interim relief denied for insufficient substantiation of disproportionate interference with Article 6(1) Basic Law family rights: The case involved a challenge to an extradition matter, where the applicant argued that holding a non-German national criminally liable outside the national territory violated their right to family life. The court held that Article 6(1) of the Basic Law generally does not protect against such extraterritorial criminal liability, and the applicant had not sufficiently demonstrated any disproportionate interference with this fundamental right based on the specific circumstances of the individual case in either the ordinary jurisdictional proceedings or the constitutional court procedure.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedura di estradizione procedimento sommario procedura pendente diritti costituzionali specifici diritto alla vita ricorso costituzionale all'estero

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art 6 Abs 1 GG
Ablehnung des Erlasses einer eA mit Tenorbegründung: unzureichende Begründung des eA-Antrags in einer auslieferungsrechtlichen Sache - gerügter Eingriff in Art 6 Abs 1 GG nicht hinreichend dargelegt
§ 93 Absatz 1 Satz 1 BVerfGG
Cited in the dispositive to confirm that the deadline for filing the underlying constitutional complaint was still open, a prerequisite for the court's assessment of the interim relief application.
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 323/25
Extradition interim relief denied for lack of substantiated fundamental rights violation
1 BvQ 66/17
Denial of interim relief due to manifest lack of substantiation of constitutional complaint
2 BvR 87/17
Denial of interim relief in constitutional complaint due to insufficient substantiation of fundamental rights violations and failure to engage with the challenged judgment
2 BvQ 54/19
Isolated application for interim relief in extradition proceedings dismissed for lack of substantiated admissibility and non-obvious unfoundedness of the anticipated constitutional complaint
1 BvQ 61/19
Interim relief denied where pending constitutional complaint lacks exhausted remedies and substantive reasoning

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 93 Absatz 1 Satz 1 BVerfGG

Cited in the dispositive to confirm that the deadline for filing the underlying constitutional complaint was still open, a prerequisite for the court's assessment of the interim relief application.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Ablehnung des Erlasses einer eA mit Tenorbegründung: unzureichende Begründung des eA-Antrags in einer auslieferungsrechtlichen Sache - gerügter Eingriff in Art 6 Abs 1 GG nicht hinreichend dargelegt

[TENOR]

Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt, weil der Antragsteller nicht substantiiert dargelegt hat, dass die bereits eingelegte Verfassungsbeschwerde, deren Frist gemäß § 93 Absatz 1 Satz 1 BVerfGG noch offen ist, weder unzulässig noch offensichtlich unbegründet ist (vgl. BVerfG, Beschluss der 2. Kammer des Ersten Senats vom 20. August 2015 - 1 BvQ 28/15 -, Rn. 2; Beschluss der 2. Kammer des Zweiten Senats vom 30. September 2015 - 2 BvQ 29/15 -, Rn. 2). Der von ihm als verletzt gerügte Artikel 6 Absatz 1 GG schützt regelmäßig nicht davor, dass ein nicht deutscher Staatsangehöriger außerhalb des Bundesgebietes strafrechtlich zur Verantwortung gezogen wird (vgl. BVerfGK 2, 165 ). Einen etwaigen unverhältnismäßigen Eingriff in Artikel 6 Absatz 1 GG aufgrund der besonderen Umstände des Einzelfalls hat der Antragsteller weder im fachgerichtlichen noch im verfassungsgerichtlichen Verfahren hinreichend dargelegt.

[GRUENDE]

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.