Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvR 1753/19 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2019:rk20190812.1bvr175319 Generato dall'IA

Constitutional complaint against appellate court decision: Inadmissibility due to insufficient demonstration of direct fundamental rights violation

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 1753/19
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court refused to accept the constitutional complaint for decision, thereby rendering the applicant's motion for interim relief moot. The applicant challenged a final decision by a Regional Court of Appeals, asserting a violation of her own fundamental rights. The court declared the complaint inadmissible under Section 93a(2) of the Federal Constitutional Court Act because the application failed to demonstrate a sufficient causal link establishing that the applicant was directly affected in her own fundamental or fundamental-equivalent rights by the lower court's ruling, and it cited the failure to submit numerous essential documents referenced by the lower court.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG, § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG, § 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG; Constitutional complaint against appellate court decision: Inadmissibility due to insufficient demonstration of direct fundamental rights violation: The applicant challenged a final decision by a Regional Court of Appeals, asserting a violation of her own fundamental rights. The court declared the complaint inadmissible under Section 93a(2) of the Federal Constitutional Court Act because the application failed to demonstrate a sufficient causal link establishing that the applicant was directly affected in her own fundamental or fundamental-equivalent rights by the lower court's ruling, and it cited the failure to submit numerous essential documents referenced by the lower court.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
requisito costituzionale diritto di manifestare ricorso costituzionale all'estero diritto acquisito concorso di diritti fondamentali effetti dell'incostituzionalità

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG
Die Annahmevoraussetzungen (§ 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG) liegen nicht vor.
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Von einer weiteren Begründung im Übrigen wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.
§ 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG
Cited in the dispositive to declare the pending application for interim relief moot upon the non-acceptance of the constitutional complaint.
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 1948/20
Inadmissibility of constitutional complaint for failure to substantiate specific fundamental rights violation against ordinary law application
1 BvR 963/16
Constitutional complaint rejected for failure to substantiate fundamental rights violation
1 BvR 1149/10
Constitutional complaint inadmissible for failure to substantiate alleged violation of fundamental rights via specific reference to § 116 ZPO enforcement proceedings
2 BvR 637/18
Inadmissibility of constitutional complaint for insufficient substantiation due to failure to submit underlying court records
2 BvR 923/24
Failure to substantiate alleged fundamental rights violation rendering constitutional complaint inadmissible under BVerfGG § 23(1) and § 92

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG

Cited in the dispositive to declare the pending application for interim relief moot upon the non-acceptance of the constitutional complaint.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahme einer mangels hinreichender Begründung unzulässigen Verfassungsbeschwerde

[TENOR]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.

Mit der Nichtannahme der Verfassungsbeschwerde wird der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung gegenstandslos (§ 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG).

[GRUENDE]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde ist nicht zur Entscheidung anzunehmen. Die Annahmevoraussetzungen (§ 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG) liegen nicht vor. Sie ist insgesamt unzulässig.

Die Begründung der Verfassungsbeschwerde lässt nicht erkennen, dass die Beschwerdeführerin durch den angegriffenen Beschluss des Oberlandesgerichts selbst in eigenen Grundrechten oder grundrechtsgleichen Rechten unmittelbar nachteilig betroffen ist. Darüber hinaus sind zahlreiche Unterlagen, auf die sich das Oberlandesgericht bezieht und deren Kenntnis für die Entscheidung über die Verfassungsbeschwerde erforderlich ist, nicht vorgelegt worden.

Von einer weiteren Begründung im Übrigen wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.