Constitutional review of compensation denial for owners of company insolvent due to seizure orders, and availability of state liability claims under § 839 BGB and Art. 34 GG.
Germania (DE)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Federal Constitutional Court refused to accept the constitutional complaint for decision, thereby upholding the lower courts' rulings that denied compensation to the complainants. The dispute concerned the refusal of compensation under Sections 2 and 3 of the Structural Change Act (StrEG) to the owners of a limited liability company that became insolvent as a result of seizure orders. The Court found no constitutional violation, noting that any damage to property rights protected by Article 14(1) of the Basic Law could be pursued through other legal avenues, specifically citing state liability claims under Section 839 of the German Civil Code in conjunction with Article 34 of the Basic Law.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 14 Abs. 1 GG, § 839 BGB, Art. 34 GG, § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Constitutional review of compensation denial for owners of company insolvent due to seizure orders, and availability of state liability claims under § 839 BGB and Art. 34 GG: The dispute concerned the refusal of compensation under Sections 2 and 3 of the Structural Change Act (StrEG) to the owners of a limited liability company that became insolvent as a result of seizure orders. The Court found no constitutional violation, noting that any damage to property rights protected by Article 14(1) of the Basic Law could be pursued through other legal avenues, specifically citing state liability claims under Section 839 of the German Civil Code in conjunction with Article 34 of the Basic Law.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAProcedural provision cited to justify the omission of a further detailed reasoning in the non-acceptance decision.
Testo completo
Nichtannahmebeschluss: Versagung einer Entschädigung gem §§ 2, 3 StrEG zugunsten der Inhaber einer infolge Arrestanordnung insolventen GmbH verfassungsrechtlich nicht zu beanstanden - Verweisung auf Geltendmachung von Amtshaftungsansprüchen
[TENOR]
Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.
[GRUENDE]
Gegen die angegriffenen Entscheidungen ist verfassungsrechtlich nichts zu erinnern. Soweit den Beschwerdeführern ein Schaden entstanden ist und sie in einem vermögenswerten Recht im Sinne von Art. 14 Abs. 1 GG beeinträchtigt sein sollten, bleibt es ihnen unbenommen, den Schaden im Rahmen der von der Rechtsordnung eröffneten Ansprüche geltend zu machen, etwa in Form von Ansprüchen nach § 839 BGB in Verbindung mit Art. 34 GG.
Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.
Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.