Denial of interim relief for insufficient substantiation that constitutional complaint is not obviously unfounded regarding lower court's interpretation of substantive law

The Federal Constitutional Court rejected the applicant's application for interim relief in a constitutional complaint, thereby upholding the lower court's decision and leaving the impugned judicial order in force. The dispute concerned a challenge to a ruling by a Higher Regional Court regarding the interpretation and application of substantive law, where the applicant sought protection against an alleged violation of fundamental rights. The court denied the measure because the applicant failed to substantiate that the main constitutional complaint was neither inadmissible nor obviously unfounded; specifically, the applicant did not sufficiently demonstrate that the constitutional review of the lower court's legal interpretation was necessary, as no constitutional deficiency in the application of simple law was apparent.