Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 2728/13, 2 BvR 2730/13, 2 BvR 2731/13 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2018:rs20180516.2bvr272813 Generato dall'IA

Constitutional complaint cost allocation and subject value determination based on contribution to clarifying fundamental legal questions

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 2728/13, 2 BvR 2730/13, 2 BvR 2731/13
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico dell'autorità / Stato
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court ordered the respondent state to reimburse one-third of the complainants' necessary attorney fees and fixed the matter's value for procedural costs at €1,000,000 per case. This decision addresses ancillary cost allocations in constitutional complaint proceedings, following a substantive ruling where the complaints were partially dismissed and partially rejected. The Court applied Section 34a(3) of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, determining that a partial refund was equitable because the proceedings, despite their mixed outcome, contributed to clarifying issues of fundamental legal significance, while Sections 37(2) and 22(1) of the Lawyers' Fees Act governed the valuation of the legal matter.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 34a Abs 3 BVerfGG, § 22 Abs. 1 RVG, § 37 Abs. 2 RVG; Constitutional complaint cost allocation and subject value determination based on contribution to clarifying fundamental legal questions: This decision addresses ancillary cost allocations in constitutional complaint proceedings, following a substantive ruling where the complaints were partially dismissed and partially rejected. The Court applied Section 34a(3) of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, determining that a partial refund was equitable because the proceedings, despite their mixed outcome, contributed to clarifying issues of fundamental legal significance, while Sections 37(2) and 22(1) of the Lawyers' Fees Act governed the valuation of the legal matter.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
spese legali ripartizione delle spese questioni processuali motivazione inadeguata delle censure costituzionali procedura di stima giurisdizione costituzionale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 34a Abs 3 BVerfGG
Basis for the order to reimburse one-third of the complainants' necessary legal costs.
§ 22 Abs. 1 RVG
Basis for fixing the value of the subject matter for the calculation of attorney fees.
§ 37 Abs. 2 RVG
Basis for fixing the value of the subject matter for the calculation of attorney fees.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 36, 146
BVerfGE 36, 146 ; 109, 190 ; 116, 69 ; 130, 1 ).
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 1390/12, 2 BvR 1438/12
Partial cost reimbursement and subject matter value assessment in constitutional complaint proceedings under § 34a BVerfGG and §§ 37, 22 RVG
2 BvR 916/11, 2 BvR 636/12
Determination of subject matter value for attorney's fees in constitutional complaint proceedings
2 BvR 740/10
Statutory basis for setting the subject matter value of attorney fees in constitutional complaint proceedings
2 BvR 571/10
Valuation of subject matter value for attorney's fees in constitutional complaint proceedings
2 BvR 946/19
Determination of subject matter value for attorney's fees in constitutional complaint proceedings

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG

Basis for the order to reimburse one-third of the complainants' necessary legal costs.

§ 37 Abs. 2 RVG

Basis for fixing the value of the subject matter for the calculation of attorney fees.

§ 22 Abs. 1 RVG

Basis for fixing the value of the subject matter for the calculation of attorney fees.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Anordnung der teilweisen Auslagenerstattung im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren (§ 34a Abs 3 BVerfGG) sowie Gegenstandswertfestsetzung

[TENOR]

Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland hat den Beschwerdeführern ihre notwendigen Auslagen zu einem Drittel zu erstatten.

Der Wert des Gegenstandes der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit der Bevollmächtigten im Hauptsacheverfahren wird jeweils auf 1.000.000 € (in Worten: eine Million Euro) festgesetzt (§ 37 Abs. 2, § 22 Abs. 1 RVG).

[GRUENDE]

Die Entscheidung über die Anordnung der Erstattung der Auslagen beruht auf § 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG. Die Verfassungsbeschwerden sind zwar teilweise verworfen und teilweise zurückgewiesen worden, haben aber in der Sache zur Klärung von Fragen von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung beigetragen (vgl. BVerfGE 36, 146 ; 109, 190 ; 116, 69 ; 130, 1 ).

Es entspricht der Billigkeit, den Beschwerdeführern die durch das Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren entstandenen notwendigen Auslagen in Höhe von einem Drittel zu erstatten.