Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvQ 83/17 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2017:qk20171220.2bvq008317 Generato dall'IA

Preventive detention open-prison transfer: failure to substantiate exhaustion of statutory legal remedies blocks isolated provisional constitutional relief

Numero d'incarto 2 BvQ 83/17
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany denied the applicant's requests for legal aid and a temporary injunction, leaving the applicant without relief. The dispute concerned a person subject to preventive detention who sought an immediate court order to transfer them to an open-security prison level, filing an isolated motion for provisional relief. The court held that the applicant failed to substantiate that the corresponding main action was admissible and not manifestly unfounded, specifically because the applicant did not demonstrate that the statutory exhaustion of legal remedies requirements had been met by pursuing the refusal to transfer under the relevant sections of the Hessian Preventive Detention Execution Act.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Preventive detention open-prison transfer: failure to substantiate exhaustion of statutory legal remedies blocks isolated provisional constitutional relief: The dispute concerned a person subject to preventive detention who sought an immediate court order to transfer them to an open-security prison level, filing an isolated motion for provisional relief. The court held that the applicant failed to substantiate that the corresponding main action was admissible and not manifestly unfounded, specifically because the applicant did not demonstrate that the statutory exhaustion of legal remedies requirements had been met by pursuing the refusal to transfer under the relevant sections of the Hessian Preventive Detention Execution Act.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
carcerazione in vista di consegna procedimento sommario gratuito patrocinio requisito costituzionale proroga della carcerazione di sicurezza esaurimento delle istanze
Generato dall'IA
2 BvQ 5/10
Constitutional interim relief for defective transfer to criminal detention barred by exhaustion of specialized judicial remedies
2 BvR 2316/21
Interim relief in constitutional complaint: failure to apply detention-law suspension criteria instead of administrative suspension standards for shackling during prisoner transfers
2 BvR 1744/10
Denial of interim relief in preventive detention case due to failure to submit judicial risk assessments for consequences balancing
2 BvR 769/10
Constitutional challenge to preventive detention: interim release denied where public security interest outweighs personal liberty due to risk of serious recidivism
2 BvQ 36/16
Suspension of prison security measures via constitutional emergency relief and the subsidiarity requirement to exhaust ordinary judicial interim proceedings

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 11 Abs. 2, § 16 Abs. 2 Hessisches Sicherungsverwahrungsvollzugsgesetz

Cited in the second order as the specific administrative act regarding the refusal to transfer to open execution that the applicant failed to demonstrate they had challenged through the proper legal channels.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Ablehnung eines isolierten eA-Antrags, gerichtet auf die Verlegung eines Sicherungsverwahrten in den offenen Vollzug - Rechtswegerschöpfung (hier: gem §§ 11 Abs 2, 16 Abs 2 SichVVollzG HE) nicht dargetan

[TENOR]

1. Der Antrag auf Bewilligung von Prozesskostenhilfe und Beiordnung von Rechtsanwalt W… wird abgelehnt, weil die beabsichtigte Rechtsverfolgung keine hinreichende Aussicht auf Erfolg bietet.

2. Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt, weil der Antragsteller nicht substantiiert dargelegt hat, dass der - gegebenenfalls noch zu stellende - Antrag in der Hauptsache weder unzulässig noch offensichtlich unbegründet ist (vgl. BVerfG, Beschluss der 2. Kammer des Ersten Senats vom 20. August 2015 - 1 BvQ 28/15 -, juris, Rn. 2; Beschluss der 2. Kammer des Zweiten Senats vom 30. September 2015 - 2 BvQ 29/15 -, juris, Rn. 2; Beschluss der 2. Kammer des Zweiten Senats vom 11. November 2015 - 2 BvQ 40/15 -, juris, Rn. 2; Beschluss der 2. Kammer des Zweiten Senats vom 8. Februar 2016 - 2 BvQ 9/16 -, juris). Insbesondere hat er nicht dargetan, dass er gegen die Versagung einer Verlegung in den offenen Vollzug nach § 11 Abs. 2, § 16 Abs. 2 Hessisches Sicherungsverwahrungsvollzugsgesetz den Rechtsweg beschritten hat.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.