Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvR 1411/17 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2017:rk20170804.1bvr141117 Generato dall'IA

Inadmissibility of constitutional complaint for failure to meet requirement of material subsidiarity in exhaustion of legal remedies

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 1411/17
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint and the associated request for interim relief became moot, leaving the respondent party prevailing. The dispute involved a challenge to a lower court decision that was rejected on procedural grounds. The Court determined that the complaint was inadmissible because it failed to satisfy the requirement of material subsidiarity, which imposes stricter obligations on the appellant than the general principle of exhausting legal remedies, specifically requiring a prior full review of all possible legal arguments by the ordinary courts.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Inadmissibility of constitutional complaint for failure to meet requirement of material subsidiarity in exhaustion of legal remedies: Mit der Nichtannahme der Verfassungsbeschwerde wird der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung gegenstandslos (§ 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG).

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
requisito costituzionale ricorso costituzionale all'estero controllo della procedura principio di sussidiarietà esaurimento delle istanze principio generale del diritto

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Von einer weiteren Begründung im Übrigen wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 107, 395
BVerfGE 107, 395 ; 134, 106 stRspr).
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 45/11
Constitutional complaint inadmissible for failure to file mandatory hearing denial complaint under material subsidiarity
1 BvR 2390/14
Constitutional complaint rejected for failure to exhaust legal remedies and insufficient substantiation
2 BvR 1627/22
Inadmissibility of constitutional complaint for lack of subsidiarity and exhaustion of legal remedies due to pending review of hearing denial under § 33a StPO
1 BvR 2077/23
Inadmissibility of constitutional complaint against interim social law rulings due to failure to exhaust remedies and lack of independent constitutional complaint
2 BvR 1312/12
Inadmissibility of constitutional complaint for failure to exhaust legal remedies by filing a motion for review of hearing errors

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahmebeschluss: Unzulässigkeit einer Verfassungsbeschwerde wegen materieller Subsidiarität

[TENOR]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.

Mit der Nichtannahme der Verfassungsbeschwerde wird der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung gegenstandslos (§ 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG).

[GRUENDE]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde ist unzulässig, weil sie den Anforderungen der - über das Gebot der Rechtswegerschöpfung im engeren Sinne hinausgehende - materiellen Subsidiarität nicht genügt (vgl. BVerfGE 107, 395 ; 134, 106 stRspr).

Von einer weiteren Begründung im Übrigen wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.