Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
2 BvR 2507/16 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2017:rk20170720.2bvr250716 Generato dall'IA

Constitutional complaint against § 217 StGB (business-like facilitation of suicide): inadmissibility due to lack of immediate and current personal grievance.

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 2507/16
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court rejected the constitutional complaint and dismissed the accompanying request for judicial recusal as inadmissible, leaving the challenged provision in force. The dispute involved a challenge to the criminal prohibition of business-like facilitation of suicide under § 217 of the German Criminal Code, with the applicant seeking to have a specific judge recused from the proceedings. The Court ruled that the complaint did not meet the admissibility requirements of § 93a para. 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act because the applicant lacked both an immediate and current personal grievance (*unmittelbare und gegenwärtige Beschwerde*), as the abstract legal provision had not yet resulted in a concrete, direct violation of the applicant's fundamental rights.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 217 StGB, § 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG; Constitutional complaint against § 217 StGB (business-like facilitation of suicide): inadmissibility due to lack of immediate and current personal grievance: The dispute involved a challenge to the criminal prohibition of business-like facilitation of suicide under § 217 of the German Criminal Code, with the applicant seeking to have a specific judge recused from the proceedings. The Court ruled that the complaint did not meet the admissibility requirements of § 93a para. 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act because the applicant lacked both an immediate and current personal grievance (*unmittelbare und gegenwärtige Beschwerde*), as the abstract legal provision had not yet resulted in a concrete, direct violation of the applicant's fundamental rights.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
requisito costituzionale denuncia penale diritti costituzionali specifici censura di violazione costituzionale istigazione e aiuto al suicidio istanza di ricusazione tardiva

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 1, 97
Die Verfassungsbeschwerde ist mangels unmittelbarer (BVerfGK 8, 75 ; 15, 491 ) und gegenwärtiger Beschwer (BVerfGE 1, 97 ; 43, 291 ; 60, 360 ; 74, 297 ; 114, 258 ) unzulässig.
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG

The provision explicitly cited in the dispositive to justify the non-acceptance of the constitutional complaint for failing to meet the admissibility requirements of an immediate decision.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahmebeschluss mit Tenorbegründung: Rechtssatzverfassungsbeschwerde gegen § 217 StGB idF vom 10.12.2015 (geschäftsmäßige Förderung der Selbsttötung) mangels unmittelbarer und gegenwärtiger Beschwer unzulässig - Verwerfung eines unzulässigen Ablehnungsgesuchs

[TENOR]

Das Ablehnungsgesuch gegen den Richter Müller wird als unzulässig verworfen. Richter Müller ist nicht zur Mitwirkung in diesem Verfahren berufen. Er gehört nicht der 2. Kammer des Zweiten Senats an.

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen. Sie erfüllt nicht die Annahmevoraussetzungen des § 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG. Die Verfassungsbeschwerde ist mangels unmittelbarer (BVerfGK 8, 75 ; 15, 491 ) und gegenwärtiger Beschwer (BVerfGE 1, 97 ; 43, 291 ; 60, 360 ; 74, 297 ; 114, 258 ) unzulässig.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.