Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 2492/16 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2017:rk20170720.2bvr249216 Generato dall'IA

Constitutional complaint against criminalization of commercial suicide facilitation rejected for insufficient substantiation

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 2492/16
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint without merits review, ruling it inadmissible due to insufficient substantiation, thereby upholding the challenged statutory provision. The case involved a challenge to Section 217 of the Criminal Code as amended in December 2015, which criminalized the commercial facilitation of suicide. The complaint failed to meet the procedural requirements of Section 23(1) and Section 92 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act regarding the specific articulation of alleged fundamental rights violations, resulting in a denial of relief and leaving the criminal prohibition in force.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 217 StGB, § 92 BVerfGG, § 93a Absatz 2 BVerfGG, § 23 Absatz 1 Satz 2 1. Halbsatz BVerfGG; Constitutional complaint against criminalization of commercial suicide facilitation rejected for insufficient substantiation: The case involved a challenge to Section 217 of the Criminal Code as amended in December 2015, which criminalized the commercial facilitation of suicide. The complaint failed to meet the procedural requirements of Section 23(1) and Section 92 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act regarding the specific articulation of alleged fundamental rights violations, resulting in a denial of relief and leaving the criminal prohibition in force.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
requisito costituzionale denuncia penale violazione dei diritti procedurali divieto legale diritti costituzionali specifici ricorso costituzionale all'estero

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 217 StGB
Nichtannahmebeschluss mit Tenorbegründung: Rechtssatzverfassungsbeschwerde gegen § 217 StGB idF vom 10.12.2015 (geschäftsmäßige Förderung der Selbsttötung) mangels hinreichender Substantiierung unzulässig
§ 92 BVerfGG
Cited in the dispositive alongside § 23 BVerfGG to define the substantive requirements for the justification of the constitutional complaint.
§ 93a Absatz 2 BVerfGG
Cited in the dispositive as the procedural basis for refusing to accept the constitutional complaint for decision because it did not meet the statutory admission requirements.
§ 23 Absatz 1 Satz 2 1. Halbsatz BVerfGG
Cited in the dispositive to establish that the complaint was not substantiated in the manner required by law, serving as the primary ground for its rejection.
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 2506/16
Mootness of constitutional complaint challenging criminalization of commercial suicide facilitation following parallel precedent rendering the statute void.
2 BvR 2667/16
Constitutional complaint against commercial suicide facilitation statute declared moot after prior parallel judgment invalidated the prohibition
2 BvR 1807/16
Moot constitutional challenge to criminal prohibition on commercial suicide facilitation due to prior invalidation of statute
2 BvR 2507/16
Constitutional complaint against § 217 StGB (business-like facilitation of suicide): inadmissibility due to lack of immediate and current personal grievance.
2 BvR 860/25
Constitutional complaint against conviction for aiding suicide: failure to prove misapprehension of standards for free and responsible will

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 93a Absatz 2 BVerfGG

Cited in the dispositive as the procedural basis for refusing to accept the constitutional complaint for decision because it did not meet the statutory admission requirements.

§ 23 Absatz 1 Satz 2 1. Halbsatz BVerfGG

Cited in the dispositive to establish that the complaint was not substantiated in the manner required by law, serving as the primary ground for its rejection.

§ 92 BVerfGG

Cited in the dispositive alongside § 23 BVerfGG to define the substantive requirements for the justification of the constitutional complaint.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahmebeschluss mit Tenorbegründung: Rechtssatzverfassungsbeschwerde gegen § 217 StGB idF vom 10.12.2015 (geschäftsmäßige Förderung der Selbsttötung) mangels hinreichender Substantiierung unzulässig

[TENOR]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen. Sie erfüllt nicht die Annahmevoraussetzungen des § 93a Absatz 2 BVerfGG. Die Verfassungsbeschwerde hat keine Aussicht auf Erfolg; sie ist nicht in einer den Anforderungen des § 23 Absatz 1 Satz 2 1. Halbsatz, § 92 BVerfGG entsprechenden Weise begründet.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.