Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 2564/16 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2016:rk20161214.2bvr256416 Generato dall'IA

Denial of interim relief against deportation: failure to prove likelihood of success in asylum follow-up application and compliance with § 51(3) VwVfG deadline

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 2564/16
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany rejected the applicant's request for interim relief to suspend deportation, thereby dismissing the constitutional complaint. The dispute concerned the enforceability of a deportation order following the rejection of an asylum claim and a subsequent unsuccessful asylum follow-up application. The Court held that the applicant failed to demonstrate the likelihood of success in the main proceedings, specifically by not showing that the statutory three-month deadline under § 51(3) of the Administrative Procedure Act for filing a follow-up application was met, and by failing to submit the initial rejection notice or the administrative court judgment to substantiate any claimed change in circumstances.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 51 Absatz 3 Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz; Denial of interim relief against deportation: failure to prove likelihood of success in asylum follow-up application and compliance with § 51(3) VwVfG deadline: The dispute concerned the enforceability of a deportation order following the rejection of an asylum claim and a subsequent unsuccessful asylum follow-up application. The Court held that the applicant failed to demonstrate the likelihood of success in the main proceedings, specifically by not showing that the statutory three-month deadline under § 51(3) of the Administrative Procedure Act for filing a follow-up application was met, and by failing to submit the initial rejection notice or the administrative court judgment to substantiate any claimed change in circumstances.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
allontanamento dall'asilo termini legali procedimento sommario licenziamento amministrativo insinuazione del credito revoca del permesso di dimora

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 51 Absatz 3 Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz
The court determined the inadmissibility of the constitutional complaint because the dispositive explicitly states it is not evident whether the three-month deadline under this provision for filing an asylum follow-up application was fulfilled.
Generato dall'IA
2 BvQ 80/21
Constitutional review of deportation: insufficient substantiation of prospects for success in main complaint precludes interim relief under § 32 BVerfGG
2 BvR 44/24
Denial of interim relief in asylum deportation where union-law compatibility of secondary application rejection was undecided
V ZB 14/10
Interim stay of deportation detention in legal complaint proceedings; applicable procedural basis and proportionality of detention for flight risk.
2 BvR 80/18
Suspend deportation pending resolution of constitutional complaint challenging time-bar of lawsuit due to defective instruction requiring claims in German and decision of disputed legal question in unappealable emergency proceedings
2 BvR 301/18
Insufficiently substantiated challenge to deportation refusal as persistent identity evader and allegation of abusive last-minute filing

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 51 Absatz 3 Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz

The court determined the inadmissibility of the constitutional complaint because the dispositive explicitly states it is not evident whether the three-month deadline under this provision for filing an asylum follow-up application was fulfilled.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Ablehnung des Erlasses einer einstweiligen Anordnung zur Aussetzung einer Abschiebung: mangelnde Darlegung der Erfolgsaussichten in der Hauptsache

[TENOR]

Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt. Die gleichzeitig erhobene Verfassungsbeschwerde enthält nicht die erforderlichen Angaben. Es ist nicht dargelegt, dass der gestellte Asylfolgeantrag Aussicht auf Erfolg hat. Ob die Dreimonatsfrist des § 51 Absatz 3 Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz erfüllt sein kann, ist nicht ersichtlich. Da der Ablehnungsbescheid des Bundesamtes für Migration und Flüchtlinge vom 15. Januar 2015 und das Urteil des Verwaltungsgerichts Regensburg vom 13. Mai 2016 zum Asylerstantrag nicht vorgelegt wurden, ist auch nicht hinreichend ersichtlich, inwieweit der Beschwerdeführer sich auf veränderte Umstände beruft.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.