Abusive recusal motions and non-acceptance of constitutional complaint

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint without further reasoning and rejected multiple recusal motions against specific judges as abusive, thereby upholding the original decision against the complainant. The case involved a constitutional complaint filed alongside attempts to disqualify panel members, which the Chamber deemed an abuse of right. Citing Section 93d(1) sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, the court determined that no further substantive justification was required for the non-acceptance of the case, and the decision was declared final and unappealable.