Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 746/15 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2015:rk20150722.2bvr074615 Generato dall'IA

Withdrawal of deportation orders to Italy and constitutional requirements for specific assurances of accommodation for families with minors

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 746/15
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Spese processuali a carico dell'autorità / Stato
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court ordered the dismissal of the constitutional complaint as moot due to the respondents' withdrawal of the challenged deportation orders, ruling that the applicants prevailed in obtaining a refund of necessary costs and setting the subject matter value at €10,000. The dispute arose from the applicants’ challenge to deportation orders to Italy, specifically contesting the adequacy of protection for families with toddlers upon arrival. The Court relied on established constitutional and Convention rights jurisprudence, requiring that a concrete, case-specific assurance from receiving authorities be obtained prior to transfer, ensuring the family would receive secured accommodation; because Italy could not provide such assurances at the time, the underlying deportation measures were rendered ineffective, necessitating the procedural closure and cost reimbursement under § 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG; Withdrawal of deportation orders to Italy and constitutional requirements for specific assurances of accommodation for families with minors: The dispute arose from the applicants’ challenge to deportation orders to Italy, specifically contesting the adequacy of protection for families with toddlers upon arrival. The Court relied on established constitutional and Convention rights jurisprudence, requiring that a concrete, case-specific assurance from receiving authorities be obtained prior to transfer, ensuring the family would receive secured accommodation; because Italy could not provide such assurances at the time, the underlying deportation measures were rendered ineffective, necessitating the procedural closure and cost reimbursement under § 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
allontanamento della famiglia diritto di recesso diritti del bambino protezione della famiglia requisito costituzionale allontanamento

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG
Cited in the operative order to mandate the respondent to reimburse the applicants' necessary legal costs following the dismissal of the case due to the withdrawal of the challenged deportation orders.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 939/14
Non-acceptance of constitutional complaint against Dublin III deportation: duty to ensure safe accommodation for newborns despite admissibility failure
2 BvR 732/14
Constitutional complaint against Dublin transfer of family with infant: insufficient substantiation of systemic defects and duty to secure accommodation
2 BvR 1795/14
Deportation to safe third country: obligation of German authorities to secure accommodation for families with infants to prevent homelessness
2 BvR 991/14
Dublin II transfer to Italy: systemic asylum deficiencies, family unity, and required pre-deportation safeguards for newborns
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 3024/14, 2 BvR 177/15, 2 BvR 601/15
Deportation of families with infants to Italy: requirement for concrete assurance of accommodation and right to be heard
2 BvR 602/15
Deportation of family with infant to Italy: requirement for concrete, individual assurance of secured accommodation from receiving authorities
2 BvR 1380/19
Insufficient factual inquiry into Italian reception conditions and lack of individual guarantees for vulnerable asylum seekers under Dublin III
2 BvR 732/14
Constitutional complaint against Dublin transfer of family with infant: insufficient substantiation of systemic defects and duty to secure accommodation
2 BvR 939/14
Non-acceptance of constitutional complaint against Dublin III deportation: duty to ensure safe accommodation for newborns despite admissibility failure

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG

Cited in the operative order to mandate the respondent to reimburse the applicants' necessary legal costs following the dismissal of the case due to the withdrawal of the challenged deportation orders.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Anordnung der Auslagenerstattung nach Einstellung des Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahrens - Gegenstandswertfestsetzung

[TENOR]

Nach Erledigung in der Hauptsache wird das Verfahren eingestellt.

Das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen hat den Beschwerdeführern ihre notwendigen Auslagen zu erstatten (§ 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG), nachdem das Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge die vor dem Verwaltungsgericht Minden angegriffenen Abschiebungsanordnungen nach Italien in den Bescheiden vom 26. September 2014 und 28. Oktober 2014 aufgehoben hat. Ausweislich einer Stellungnahme des Bundesamts vom 15. Juni 2015 können die verfassungs- und konventionsrechtlichen Anforderungen an die Überstellung von Familien mit Kleinstkindern (vgl. BVerfG, Beschlüsse der 3.

Kammer des Zweiten Senats vom 17. September 2014 - 2 BvR 939/14 -, NVwZ 2014, S. 1511, - 2 BvR 732/14 und 2 BvR 1795/14 -, jeweils juris sowie - 2 BvR 991/14 -, BeckRS 2014, 56942 und EGMR , Tarakhel v. Schweiz, Urteil vom 4. November 2014, Nr. 29217/12, NVwZ 2015, S. 127), wonach vor einer Überstellung eine konkrete und einzelfallbezogene Zusicherung der italienischen Behörden einzuholen ist, dass die Familie in Italien eine gesicherte Unterkunft für alle Familienmitglieder erhalten werde, im Falle der Beschwerdeführer derzeit nicht erfüllt werden, da seitens Italiens gegenwärtig keine entsprechend konkreten Zusicherungen erteilt werden.

Damit erledigt sich der Antrag auf Bewilligung von Prozesskostenhilfe und Beiordnung von Rechtsanwalt M.

Der Wert des Gegenstands der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit wird für das Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren und für das Verfahren auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung auf insgesamt 10.000 € (in Worten: zehntausend Euro) festgesetzt.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.