Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvQ 1/16 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2016:qk20160119.1bvq000116 Generato dall'IA

Inadmissibility of constitutional interim relief due to insufficient substantiation and failure to exhaust judicial remedies

Numero d'incarto 1 BvQ 1/16
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the application for interim relief as inadmissible, denying the applicant's requested injunctive relief. The dispute involved a request for interim constitutional protection, which the court found procedurally deficient. The decision rests on two decisive grounds: the application failed to meet the substantial reasoning requirements under Section 23(1) sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, and the applicant had not exhausted the statutory legal remedies by pursuing the case through the competent specialized courts, as required by Section 90(2) sentence 1 of the same Act.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 23 Abs. 1 Satz 2 BVerfGG, § 90 Abs. 2 Satz 1 BVerfGG; Inadmissibility of constitutional interim relief due to insufficient substantiation and failure to exhaust judicial remedies: Der Antrag ist unzulässig. Er genügt weder den - auch im Verfahren des einstweiligen Rechtsschutzes geltenden (vgl. BVerfGE 122, 63 ) - Begründungsanforderungen des § 23 Abs. 1 Satz 2 BVerfGG noch ist der Rechtsweg zu den Fachgerichten erschöpft worden (§ 90 Abs. 2 Satz 1 BVerfGG).

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedimento sommario requisito costituzionale presupposti legali censura di violazione costituzionale tutela legale procedimento pregiudiziale d'urgenza

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 23 Abs. 1 Satz 2 BVerfGG
BVerfGE 122, 63 ) - Begründungsanforderungen des § 23 Abs. 1 Satz 2 BVerfGG noch ist der Rechtsweg zu den Fachgerichten erschöpft worden (§ 90 Abs.
§ 90 Abs. 2 Satz 1 BVerfGG
1 Satz 2 BVerfGG noch ist der Rechtsweg zu den Fachgerichten erschöpft worden (§ 90 Abs. 2 Satz 1 BVerfGG).

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 122, 63
BVerfGE 122, 63 ) - Begründungsanforderungen des § 23 Abs.
Generato dall'IA
1 BvQ 51/17
Inadmissibility of interim relief application for failure to meet statutory substantiation requirements
2 BvQ 35/23
Inadmissibility of constitutional interim relief in criminal proceedings for failure to substantiate prospects of success
2 BvQ 103/21
Failure to substantiate admissibility and merits of main constitutional complaint bars interim relief
2 BvQ 31/17
Denial of interim relief where underlying constitutional complaint is inadmissible due to unexhausted ordinary judicial remedies
1 BvQ 85/23
Inadmissibility of interim constitutional relief for failure to substantiate the main complaint and submit challenged decisions

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Ablehnung des Erlasses einer einstweiligen Anordnung bei unzureichender Substantiierung und mangelnder Rechtswegerschöpfung

[GRUENDE]

Der Antrag ist unzulässig. Er genügt weder den - auch im Verfahren des einstweiligen Rechtsschutzes geltenden (vgl. BVerfGE 122, 63 ) - Begründungsanforderungen des § 23 Abs. 1 Satz 2 BVerfGG noch ist der Rechtsweg zu den Fachgerichten erschöpft worden (§ 90 Abs. 2 Satz 1 BVerfGG).