Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvR 2781/13 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2014:rk20140908.1bvr278113 Generato dall'IA

Mootness of constitutional complaint following settlement: Enforceability review barred where underlying claims extinguished

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 2781/13
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The German Federal Constitutional Court issued a non-acceptance decision, effectively leaving the underlying state court judgment in force and denying the constitutional complainant relief. The case involved a constitutional complaint challenging the outcome of prior proceedings, but the dispute was mooted because the parties concluded a settlement agreement after the complaint was filed, whereby fulfilling the settlement obligations extinguished the underlying claims. Applying § 93a(2)(b) BVerfGG, the Court held that acceptance for the enforcement of rights was unnecessary because the settlement excluded the possibility of a more favorable procedural result upon remand, and further finding no fundamental significance under § 93a(2)(a) BVerfGG, thereby rendering the decision unappealable.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG, § 93a Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Mootness of constitutional complaint following settlement: Enforceability review barred where underlying claims extinguished: The case involved a constitutional complaint challenging the outcome of prior proceedings, but the dispute was mooted because the parties concluded a settlement agreement after the complaint was filed, whereby fulfilling the settlement obligations extinguished the underlying claims. Applying § 93a(2)(b) BVerfGG, the Court held that acceptance for the enforcement of rights was unnecessary because the settlement excluded the possibility of a more favorable procedural result upon remand, and further finding no fundamental significance under § 93a(2)(a) BVerfGG, thereby rendering the decision unappealable.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
fine del processo ricorso costituzionale all'estero decisione d'esecuzione questioni processuali diritto delle obbligazioni diritti fondamentali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.
§ 93a Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Procedural basis cited for waiving the further written explanation of the decision.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 90, 22
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 239/14
Erledigterklärung, Auslagenerstattung, and Gegenstandswert in constitutional complaint proceedings
1 BvR 1799/19
Constitutional complaint non-acceptance rendering interim relief moot in parallel decision context
2 BvR 2255/21
Reimbursement of constitutional complaint expenses after mootness: no equitable exception without acknowledgment of illegality and despite initial inadmissibility for unexhausted remedies
1 BvR 2001/16
Constitutional complaint moot due to expiration of underlying proceedings; fixing of amount in dispute for interim relief proceedings
1 BvR 2192/21
Constitutional complaint terminated after applicant’s counsel declared the matter resolved

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 93a Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG

Procedural basis cited for waiving the further written explanation of the decision.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahmebeschluss: Durchsetzungsannahme (§ 93a Abs 2 Buchst b BVerfGG) nicht geboten, da nach Vergleich im Ausgangsverfahren auch im Falle einer Zurückverweisung kein günstigeres Ergebnis erreichbar ist

[GRUENDE]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde hat keine grundsätzliche Bedeutung (§ 93a Abs. 2 Buchstabe a BVerfGG). Ihre Annahme ist auch nicht zur Durchsetzung der als verletzt bezeichneten Rechte angezeigt (§ 93a Abs. 2 Buchstabe b BVerfGG), denn die Beschwerdeführerin hat mit dem Beklagten des Ausgangsverfahrens nach Erhebung der Verfassungsbeschwerde einen Vergleich abgeschlossen, wonach mit der Erfüllung der Verpflichtungen aus dem Vergleich auch die dem Ausgangsverfahren zugrunde liegenden Ansprüche erledigt sind. Dadurch ist im Falle der Zurückverweisung ein der Beschwerdeführerin günstigeres Verfahrensergebnis ausgeschlossen (vgl. BVerfGE 90, 22 ).

Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.