Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvR 3279/14 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2015:rk20150413.1bvr327914 Generato dall'IA

Sufficiency of predictive elements in assembly ban: hostile state views and left-autonomous participation as standalone justifications for violence prognosis

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 3279/14
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court issued a non-admission decision, leaving the challenged assembly ban in force and finding the complainant's complaint inadmissible, while noting that the underlying safety prognosis was not fully constitutionally sustainable. The dispute concerned a prohibition order for a public assembly, where the applicant challenged the lower court's assessment that hostile attitudes toward the state and police, combined with the anticipated participation of a significant number of individuals from the left-wing autonomous scene, constituted sufficient grounds to predict violent conduct. While the Court held that these specific factors alone did not form a robust basis for a violence prognosis, it concluded that considering the totality of the circumstances, the lower court's evaluation remained within its margin of discretion, resulting in no remedy granted.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Sufficiency of predictive elements in assembly ban: hostile state views and left-autonomous participation as standalone justifications for violence prognosis: The dispute concerned a prohibition order for a public assembly, where the applicant challenged the lower court's assessment that hostile attitudes toward the state and police, combined with the anticipated participation of a significant number of individuals from the left-wing autonomous scene, constituted sufficient grounds to predict violent conduct. While the Court held that these specific factors alone did not form a robust basis for a violence prognosis, it concluded that considering the totality of the circumstances, the lower court's evaluation remained within its margin of discretion, resulting in no remedy granted.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
polizia e ordine pubblico libertà di riunione e di associazione tassazione secondo il potere d'apprezzamento violenza contro le autorità movimenti politici reati contro la volontà popolare

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Procedural basis cited in the dispositive to waive further reasoning on the non-admission of the complaint.
Generato dall'IA
1 BvR 2636/04
Police body search of assembly participants: unconstitutionality of general danger prognosis based solely on anticipated counter-demonstration violence
6 B 1/20
Dissolution of assembly due to counter-demonstrator violence: limits of police necessity and proportionality of less restrictive means
1 BvR 2298/10
Interim reinstatement of suspensive effect of assembly ban due to insufficient factual basis for danger prognosis regarding explosives
1 BvQ 32/15
Interim suspension of a general ban on public assemblies: balancing freedom of assembly against police safety concerns in a politically charged context
6 C 1/22
Police intervention in unfriendly assemblies: scope of assembly law blocking effect and constitutional limits on custodial fact-finding

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG

Procedural basis cited in the dispositive to waive further reasoning on the non-admission of the complaint.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahmebeschluss: Zur Gefahrenprognose im Rahmen eines Versammlungsverbots - "staatsfeindliche" Einstellung der Versammlungsteilnehmer sowie Anzahl der Teilnehmer aus linksautonomer Szene keine tragfähigen Anhaltspunkte für gewalttätigen Versammlungsverlauf

[GRUENDE]

Die Entscheidung ist im Ergebnis verfassungsrechtlich tragfähig. Allerdings liegt dem von dem Beschwerdeführer angegriffenen Versammlungsverbot eine Gefahrenprognose zugrunde, die nicht in jeder Hinsicht auf verfassungsrechtlich tragfähige Erwägungen gestützt ist. Insbesondere begründen eine feindliche Positionierung der Versammlungsteilnehmer gegenüber dem deutschen Staat und die Tatsache, dass diese die Polizei als Exekutive und Repräsentant staatlicher Macht in besonderem Maße als Übel ansehen, ebensowenig einen tragfähigen Gesichtspunkt für die Prognose einer drohenden Gewalttätigkeit der Versammlung, wie die zu erwartende Teilnahme einer erheblichen Zahl von Angehörigen der linksautonomen Szene. Im Blick auf weitere Erwägungen hält sich die Gefahrenprognose jedoch bei Gesamtsicht im fachgerichtlichen Wertungsrahmen.

Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.