Bank disclosure duties in financed real estate acquisitions: constitutional review of non-acceptance under § 93d BVerfGG

The German Federal Constitutional Court refused to accept a constitutional complaint for decision, leaving the underlying lower court judgments in force without providing a reasoned explanation pursuant to § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG. The dispute concerned a claim of violation of fundamental rights stemming from a bank's alleged failure to fulfill its duty to disclose relevant information (Aufklärungspflichten) during a financed real estate acquisition. The decision serves as a procedural termination of the constitutional review, with no substantive legal reasoning articulated, indicating that the matter did not meet the threshold for constitutional acceptance on the facts presented.