Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvQ 33/11 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2013:qk20131204.1bvq003311 Generato dall'IA

Single fee claim under § 7(1) RVG when one representative acts for multiple clients in the same constitutional proceeding based on a jointly fixed matter value

Numero d'incarto 1 BvQ 33/11
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the immediate complaint, upholding the legal officer's cost assessment where the represented parties' total legal fees were calculated based on a jointly fixed matter value of €4,000. The dispute concerned the interpretation of attorney's fees in constitutional proceedings, specifically whether a procedural representative acting for multiple complainants in the same case could claim separate fees for each client. Applying § 7(1) RVG, the Court held that when the requests of multiple clients are asserted uniformly within the same proceedings and share an internal connection, the representative is deemed to have acted in the same matter, entitling them to charge the fee only once based on the aggregate matter value fixed by the Court.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 7 Abs 1 RVG; Single fee claim under § 7(1) RVG when one representative acts for multiple clients in the same constitutional proceeding based on a jointly fixed matter value: The dispute concerned the interpretation of attorney's fees in constitutional proceedings, specifically whether a procedural representative acting for multiple complainants in the same case could claim separate fees for each client. Applying § 7(1) RVG, the Court held that when the requests of multiple clients are asserted uniformly within the same proceedings and share an internal connection, the representative is deemed to have acted in the same matter, entitling them to charge the fee only once based on the aggregate matter value fixed by the Court.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
spese legali oggetto della lite tassazione delle spese tassa di allacciamento atti procedurali utile

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 7 Abs 1 RVG
Served as the main legal ground for dismissing the immediate complaint against the cost assessment by establishing that the representative acted in the same matter, entitling them to only one fee based on the jointly fixed matter value.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 96, 251
BVerfGE 96, 251 ; BVerfG, Beschluss des Ersten Senats vom 22.
1 BvR 2437/95
März 2000 - 1 BvR 2437/95 -, juris Rn.
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 2238/13
No surcharge fee for multiple representation in constitutional complaints due to lack of identity of subject matter
1 BvR 661/06
Valuation of matter value for attorney fee calculation in constitutional complaint proceedings under §§ 14(1), 37(2) RVG
2 BvR 1022/08, 2 BvR 182/09
Fixing the value of the subject matter for attorney fees in constitutional complaint proceedings under §§ 37(2) sentence 2 and 22(1) RVG
1 BvR 1627/19
Valuation of attorney fees in constitutional complaint proceedings under RVG fee principles
1 BvR 2884/18
Valuation of constitutional complaint proceedings for attorney fee calculation under RVG § 37

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 7 Abs. 1 RVG

Served as the main legal ground for dismissing the immediate complaint against the cost assessment by establishing that the representative acted in the same matter, entitling them to only one fee based on the jointly fixed matter value.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Zurückweisung einer sofortigen Beschwerde gegen Kostenfestsetzung: Tätigwerden des Bevollmächtigten in derselben Sache iSd § 7 Abs 1 RVG

[GRUENDE]

Die zulässige sofortige Beschwerde ist unbegründet. Die Rechtspflegerin hat die Kosten zu Recht nach dem vom Bundesverfassungsgericht verbindlich für beide Beschwerdeführer zusammen auf 4.000 € festgesetzten Gegenstandswert angesetzt.

Der Verfahrensbevollmächtigte ist für die Beschwerdeführer in derselben Angelegenheit tätig geworden, § 7 Abs. 1 RVG. Dafür genügt es im gerichtlichen Verfahren regelmäßig schon, dass die Begehren mehrerer Auftraggeber - wie hier - einheitlich in demselben Verfahren geltend gemacht werden und zwischen ihnen ein innerer Zusammenhang besteht (vgl. BVerfGE 96, 251 ; BVerfG, Beschluss des Ersten Senats vom 22. März 2000 - 1 BvR 2437/95 -, juris Rn. 2). Ausweislich des eindeutigen Wortlauts des § 7 Abs. 1 RVG folgt hieraus, dass der Verfahrensbevollmächtigte die Gebühren nur einmal, nämlich aus dem vom Bundesverfassungsgericht verbindlich festgesetzten Gegenstandswert fordern kann.