Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvR 1010/13 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2013:rk20130412.1bvr101013 Generato dall'IA

Constitutional challenge to allocation of media seating in national security trial proceedings

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 1010/13
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court (1st Senate, 3rd Chamber) refused to accept the constitutional complaint for decision and deemed the pending application for a preliminary injunction moot, thereby dismissing the challenge without providing a reasoned explanation. The dispute concerned the allocation of press seating during the trial proceedings related to the NSU case, with the complainant objecting to the specific assignment of media positions. The court relied on its discretionary power to dispense with a written justification pursuant to Section 93d(1) sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), resulting in a final and unappealable order where the constitutional complaint was not admitted and the status quo of the lower proceedings remained unaffected.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Constitutional challenge to allocation of media seating in national security trial proceedings: The dispute concerned the allocation of press seating during the trial proceedings related to the NSU case, with the complainant objecting to the specific assignment of media positions. The court relied on its discretionary power to dispense with a written justification pursuant to Section 93d(1) sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), resulting in a final and unappealable order where the constitutional complaint was not admitted and the status quo of the lower proceedings remained unaffected.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
ripartizione dei seggi ricorso costituzionale all'estero procedura pendente diritto di stampa decisione pregiudiziale procedimento contenzioso

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Procedural basis cited in the dispositive to justify the omission of a written reasoning for the non-acceptance of the constitutional complaint.
Generato dall'IA
1 BvR 1002/13
Allocation of press seating in terrorism trial: denial of legal aid due to lack of success prospect
1 BvR 1617/20
Constitutional complaint for lack of special interest in retrospective finding of procedural inequality of arms in press law injunction proceedings
1 BvQ 13/13
Journalist's right to trial seat and video transmission of criminal proceedings under press freedom
1 BvR 1007/13
Constitutional review of interlocutory precautionary orders in criminal trial proceedings
2 BvC 14/20
Constitutional Court panel composition challenge and blanket recusal motion for prior case involvement and academic publications

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG

Procedural basis cited in the dispositive to justify the omission of a written reasoning for the non-acceptance of the constitutional complaint.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung: Vergabe von Presseplätzen im "NSU-Verfahren"

[TENOR] Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.

Damit erledigt sich zugleich der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung.

[GRUENDE]

Von einer Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.