Constitutional review of interlocutory precautionary orders in criminal trial proceedings

The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany declined to accept the constitutional complaint for decision, finding it manifestly unfounded as no infringement of the complainant's fundamental rights was evident, thereby concurrently dismissing the application for a preliminary injunction. The case involved a challenge to interlocutory precautionary orders issued by the presiding judge in the trial proceedings known as the "NSU Process." The court relied on Section 93d(1), Sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG) to dispense with a detailed legal rationale, noting that the decision is final and unappealable.