Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvR 1002/13 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2013:rk20130412.1bvr100213 Generato dall'IA

Allocation of press seating in terrorism trial: denial of legal aid due to lack of success prospect

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 1002/13
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The German Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfG) dismissed the constitutional complaint without a reasoned opinion, denying the applicant's application for legal aid and the appointment of a lawyer as the complaint lacked a sufficient prospect of success; consequently, the request for interim injunctive relief was deemed moot. The dispute concerned the allocation of press seating in a high-profile terrorism trial, specifically challenging the procedural treatment of media access. The decision was issued under § 93d(1) sentence 3 BVerfGG, which allows the court to omit the statement of reasons for dismissals, and the ruling is final and not subject to appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 114 Satz 1 ZPO, § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG, § 114 Satz 1 ZPO analog; Allocation of press seating in terrorism trial: denial of legal aid due to lack of success prospect: The dispute concerned the allocation of press seating in a high-profile terrorism trial, specifically challenging the procedural treatment of media access. The decision was issued under § 93d(1) sentence 3 BVerfGG, which allows the court to omit the statement of reasons for dismissals, and the ruling is final and not subject to appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
perizia giuridica accesso dei media gratuito patrocinio ripartizione dei seggi diritto di stampa questioni processuali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 114 Satz 1 ZPO
Der Antrag auf Bewilligung von Prozesskostenhilfe und Beiordnung eines Rechtsanwalts wird abgelehnt, weil die Verfassungsbeschwerde keine hinreichende Aussicht auf Erfolg bietet (§ 114 Satz 1 ZPO analog).
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Von einer Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.
§ 114 Satz 1 ZPO analog
Cited in the dispositive as the basis for denying legal aid and the appointment of a lawyer because the constitutional complaint lacked a sufficient prospect of success.
Generato dall'IA
1 BvR 2352/22
Denial of legal aid for constitutional complaint due to lack of necessity and prospects of success
1 BvR 1617/20
Constitutional complaint for lack of special interest in retrospective finding of procedural inequality of arms in press law injunction proceedings
1 BvR 977/21
Constitutional complaint: denial of legal aid for failure to demonstrate sufficient prospect of success
1 BvR 2217/21
Rejection of legal aid and constitutional complaint for failure to substantiate prospects of success and fundamental rights violation
1 BvR 1877/22
Denial of legal aid for intended constitutional complaint due to lack of necessity and prospects of success

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 114 Satz 1 ZPO analog

Cited in the dispositive as the basis for denying legal aid and the appointment of a lawyer because the constitutional complaint lacked a sufficient prospect of success.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung: Vergabe von Presseplätzen im "NSU-Verfahren"

[TENOR]

Der Antrag auf Bewilligung von Prozesskostenhilfe und Beiordnung eines Rechtsanwalts wird abgelehnt, weil die Verfassungsbeschwerde keine hinreichende Aussicht auf Erfolg bietet (§ 114 Satz 1 ZPO analog).

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.

Damit erledigt sich zugleich der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung.

[GRUENDE]

Von einer Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.