Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
2 BvE 1/12 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2012:es20120620.2bve000112 Generato dall'IA

Inter-state dispute rejected at threshold for failure to prove representative's power of attorney under § 22 Abs. 2 BVerfGG

Numero d'incarto 2 BvE 1/12
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the application at the outset, ruling that it had not been validly filed because the applicant's representative failed to provide evidence of proper authorization despite repeated court demands. This procedural ruling in an inter-state dispute (Organstreitverfahren) means the case was not admissible and no substantive decision on the merits was reached, resulting in a procedural loss for the applicant. The decisive legal basis was Section 22(2) of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which mandates proof of the representative's power of attorney, and Section 24 Sentence 2 BVerfGG, which permitted the court to omit a further detailed justification for this dismissal due to the obvious procedural defect.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 22 Abs 2 BVerfGG, § 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG; Inter-state dispute rejected at threshold for failure to prove representative's power of attorney under § 22 Abs. 2 BVerfGG: This procedural ruling in an inter-state dispute (Organstreitverfahren) means the case was not admissible and no substantive decision on the merits was reached, resulting in a procedural loss for the applicant. The decisive legal basis was Section 22(2) of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which mandates proof of the representative's power of attorney, and Section 24 Sentence 2 BVerfGG, which permitted the court to omit a further detailed justification for this dismissal due to the obvious procedural defect.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
mancanza di prova causa interstatuale procura potere di decisione atto processuale divieto di rappresentanza dell'avvocato

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Verwerfung (A-limine-Abweisung) eines Antrags im Organstreitverfahren - Mangels Nachweises der Bevollmächtigung des Prozessvertreters (§ 22 Abs 2 BVerfGG) keine wirksame Anhängigmachung des Antrags

[GRUENDE]

Der Antrag ist nicht wirksam anhängig gemacht worden, da der Vertreter der Antragstellerin - auch nach wiederholter Aufforderung

durch das Gericht - den Nachweis seiner Bevollmächtigung gemäß § 22 Abs. 2 BVerfGG nicht geführt hat.

Auf die Mängel der Vollmacht hat der Berichterstatter hingewiesen. Gemäß § 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG wird von einer weiteren Begründung

abgesehen.