Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
1 BvR 529/12 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2012:rk20120419.1bvr052912 Generato dall'IA

Presumed service of administrative acts under § 122(2) AO and requirements for fundamental significance in fiscal proceedings

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 529/12
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The German Federal Constitutional Court (First Senate, First Chamber) denied the applicant’s request for legal aid and refused to accept the constitutional complaint for decision, upholding the lower court’s position. The case involved a dispute concerning the presumed service of an administrative act under § 122(2) of the Fiscal Code (AO) and the requirements for admitting a constitutional complaint on the grounds of fundamental significance within fiscal court proceedings. The Court based its decision on § 93d(1) sentence 3 of the Rules of Procedure of the Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfGG), determining that the intended legal action had no prospect of success, resulting in a final, unappealable non-acceptance order without detailed reasoning.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 122 Abs 2 AO, § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Presumed service of administrative acts under § 122(2) AO and requirements for fundamental significance in fiscal proceedings: The case involved a dispute concerning the presumed service of an administrative act under § 122(2) of the Fiscal Code (AO) and the requirements for admitting a constitutional complaint on the grounds of fundamental significance within fiscal court proceedings. The Court based its decision on § 93d(1) sentence 3 of the Rules of Procedure of the Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfGG), determining that the intended legal action had no prospect of success, resulting in a final, unappealable non-acceptance order without detailed reasoning.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
atti amministrativi requisito costituzionale procedura fiscale procedura di gratuito patrocinio regolamento interno vertenza non amministrativa

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 122 Abs 2 AO
Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung: Vermutung des Zugangs eines Verwaltungsakts gem § 122 Abs 2 AO 1977 - Voraussetzungen für Grundsatzzulassung wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung im finanzgerichtlichen Verfahren
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Procedural provision cited in the dispositive to justify the court's decision to omit the reasoning of the order.
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG

Procedural provision cited in the dispositive to justify the court's decision to omit the reasoning of the order.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung: Vermutung des Zugangs eines Verwaltungsakts gem § 122 Abs 2 AO 1977 - Voraussetzungen für Grundsatzzulassung wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung im finanzgerichtlichen Verfahren

[TENOR]

Der Antrag auf Bewilligung von Prozesskostenhilfe und Beiordnung eines Rechtsanwalts wird abgelehnt, weil die beabsichtigte

Rechtsverfolgung keine Aussicht auf Erfolg hat.

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.

Von einer Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.