Presumed service of administrative acts under § 122(2) AO and requirements for fundamental significance in fiscal proceedings
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe German Federal Constitutional Court (First Senate, First Chamber) denied the applicant’s request for legal aid and refused to accept the constitutional complaint for decision, upholding the lower court’s position. The case involved a dispute concerning the presumed service of an administrative act under § 122(2) of the Fiscal Code (AO) and the requirements for admitting a constitutional complaint on the grounds of fundamental significance within fiscal court proceedings. The Court based its decision on § 93d(1) sentence 3 of the Rules of Procedure of the Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfGG), determining that the intended legal action had no prospect of success, resulting in a final, unappealable non-acceptance order without detailed reasoning.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IA§ 122 Abs 2 AO, § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Presumed service of administrative acts under § 122(2) AO and requirements for fundamental significance in fiscal proceedings: The case involved a dispute concerning the presumed service of an administrative act under § 122(2) of the Fiscal Code (AO) and the requirements for admitting a constitutional complaint on the grounds of fundamental significance within fiscal court proceedings. The Court based its decision on § 93d(1) sentence 3 of the Rules of Procedure of the Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfGG), determining that the intended legal action had no prospect of success, resulting in a final, unappealable non-acceptance order without detailed reasoning.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAProcedural provision cited in the dispositive to justify the court's decision to omit the reasoning of the order.
Testo completo
Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung: Vermutung des Zugangs eines Verwaltungsakts gem § 122 Abs 2 AO 1977 - Voraussetzungen für Grundsatzzulassung wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung im finanzgerichtlichen Verfahren
[TENOR]
Der Antrag auf Bewilligung von Prozesskostenhilfe und Beiordnung eines Rechtsanwalts wird abgelehnt, weil die beabsichtigte
Rechtsverfolgung keine Aussicht auf Erfolg hat.
Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.
Von einer Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.
Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.