Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
1 BvR 367/12 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2012:rs20120504.1bvr036712 Generato dall'IA

Interim suspension of call-by-call price announcement mandate due to missing transitional period

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 367/12
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court granted the requested interim relief, ordering that the statutory provision mandating price announcements for call-by-call telephone calls not enter into force prior to August 1, 2012, while denying all other aspects of the application; the applicants prevailed in securing a moratorium on the disputed regulation. The dispute arose from a challenge to a federal telecommunications amendment adopted by the Bundestag in February 2012, which introduced immediate pricing obligations for specific telephone services without providing a transitional period for compliance. Relying on Section 32, Paragraph 5, Sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, the court issued this preliminary ruling to prevent imminent legal effects, deferring the entry into force of the specific norm to allow for a reasonable transition period, with the full grounds to be communicated separately to the parties.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 32 Abs. 5 Satz 2 BVerfGG, § 32 Abs. 5 S. 2 BVerfGG; Interim suspension of call-by-call price announcement mandate due to missing transitional period: The dispute arose from a challenge to a federal telecommunications amendment adopted by the Bundestag in February 2012, which introduced immediate pricing obligations for specific telephone services without providing a transitional period for compliance. Relying on Section 32, Paragraph 5, Sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, the court issued this preliminary ruling to prevent imminent legal effects, deferring the entry into force of the specific norm to allow for a reasonable transition period, with the full grounds to be communicated separately to the parties.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
servizi di telecomunicazione procedimento sommario disposizioni transitorie termine di sospensione effetti delle pronunce pregiudiziali entrata in vigore

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 32 Abs. 5 S. 2 BVerfGG

Cited in the dispositive as the procedural basis for separating the written reasoning from the immediate operative order regarding the interim injunction.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung: Aufschub des Inkrafttretens der Reglungen über die Einführung einer Preisansagepflicht für Call-by-Call-Telefonate - Fehlen einer Übergangsfrist - hier: Vorabentscheidung gem § 32 Abs 5 S 2 BVerfGG

[TENOR]

Artikel 1 Nummer 62 Buchstabe a) aa) des vom Deutschen Bundestag am 9. Februar 2012 beschlossenen und vom Bundespräsidenten am 3. Mai 2012 ausgefertigten Gesetzes zur Änderung telekommunikationsrechtlicher Regelungen tritt nicht vor dem 1. August 2012 in Kraft.

Im Übrigen wird der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung abgelehnt.

...

Die Begründung wird den Beteiligten gesondert übermittelt (§ 32 Abs. 5 Satz 2 BVerfGG).