Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 BvR 3069/11 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2012:rk20120110.1bvr306911 Generato dall'IA

Denial of legal aid for planned constitutional complaint due to deadline expiration

Numero d'incarto 1 BvR 3069/11
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court denied the applicant's request for legal aid to file a constitutional complaint, resulting in the rejection of the application and leaving the underlying decisions of the Landessozialgericht and Sozialgericht in force. The dispute concerned the applicant's attempt to challenge social court rulings via constitutional review, but the court found the intended complaint lacked sufficient prospects of success because it could not be filed within the statutory deadline under § 93 Abs. 1 BVerfGG, and no application for reinstatement of the deadline under § 93 Abs. 2 BVerfGG was submitted. Consequently, the court declined to provide further reasoning pursuant to § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG, rendering the decision final and unappealable.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 93 Abs. 1 BVerfGG, § 93 Abs. 2 BVerfGG, § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Denial of legal aid for planned constitutional complaint due to deadline expiration: The dispute concerned the applicant's attempt to challenge social court rulings via constitutional review, but the court found the intended complaint lacked sufficient prospects of success because it could not be filed within the statutory deadline under § 93 Abs. 1 BVerfGG, and no application for reinstatement of the deadline under § 93 Abs. 2 BVerfGG was submitted. Consequently, the court declined to provide further reasoning pursuant to § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG, rendering the decision final and unappealable.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
termine processuale perentorio gratuito patrocinio base legale motivazione inadeguata delle censure costituzionali soccorso d'emergenza costituzionale preclusione per tardività

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 93 Abs. 1 BVerfGG
Cited as the procedural basis for the lack of prospects of success because the intended constitutional complaint could not be filed within the statutory deadline.
§ 93 Abs. 2 BVerfGG
Cited to note that no application for reinstatement into the former state was submitted, which precluded the timely filing of the complaint.
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Applied in the dispositive to dispense with a further detailed reasoning for the decision.
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 2354/17
Denial of legal aid for constitutional complaint due to expired deadline and missing essential factual submissions.
2 BvR 804/14
Denial of legal aid for constitutional complaint due to expired one-month filing deadline and failure to cure procedural delay
1 BvR 256/23
Constitutional complaint against denial of legal aid; missed filing deadline due to prior appeals being obviously inadmissible
1 BvR 30/20
Denial of legal aid and non-acceptance of constitutional complaint for failure to substantiate timely filing and fundamental rights violations in social court resumption proceedings
1 BvR 2434/21
Legal aid for pending constitutional complaint denied for lack of necessity and insufficient prospect of success

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 93 Abs. 1 BVerfGG

Cited as the procedural basis for the lack of prospects of success because the intended constitutional complaint could not be filed within the statutory deadline.

§ 93 Abs. 2 BVerfGG

Cited to note that no application for reinstatement into the former state was submitted, which precluded the timely filing of the complaint.

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG

Applied in the dispositive to dispense with a further detailed reasoning for the decision.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Versagung von PKH für eine noch zu erhebende Verfassungsbeschwerde - Unzulässigkeit der beabsichtigten Verfassungsbeschwerde wegen Fristversäumung

[TENOR]

Der Antrag auf Bewilligung von Prozesskostenhilfe unter Beiordnung eines Rechtsanwalts für eine noch zu erhebende Verfassungsbeschwerde

wird abgelehnt.

[GRUENDE]

Der Antrag auf Bewilligung von Prozesskostenhilfe unter Beiordnung eines Rechtsanwalts ist wegen fehlender hinreichender Erfolgsaussicht

der beabsichtigten Verfassungsbeschwerde gegen die Beschlüsse des Landessozialgerichts und des Sozialgerichts abzulehnen.

Denn die beabsichtigte Verfassungsbeschwerde könnte nicht fristgerecht erhoben werden (§ 93 Abs. 1 BVerfGG). Ein Antrag auf

Wiedereinsetzung in den vorigen Stand (§ 93 Abs. 2 BVerfGG) ist nicht gestellt.

Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.