Constitutional complaint rejected without reasoned chamber decision under § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG

The Federal Constitutional Court declined to accept the constitutional complaint for decision, rendering the decision unchallengeable without providing a written reasoning. The dispute involved a constitutional complaint challenging a lower court decision, though the specific subject matter and material facts are not detailed in the operative text. The court relied on § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which permits the omission of a written justification in chamber decisions where the complaint is not admissible or manifestly unsuccessful, effectively dismissing the applicant's challenge.