Constitutional complaint non-admission due to failure to meet threshold for substantive review

The Federal Constitutional Court (2nd Senate, 3rd Chamber) refused to admit the constitutional complaint for decision, thereby leaving the underlying complaint inadmissible and final. The proceeding concerned a constitutional complaint challenging a lower court’s judgment, though the specific substantive law or administrative act at issue is not detailed in this unreasoned order. The Court relied on the procedural standard that a constitutional complaint must be admissible and have prospects of success to be accepted; by declining to admit the case under Section 93b of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, the chamber indicated the complaint failed to meet the threshold for substantive review, resulting in a final and unappealable procedural dismissal.