Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 987/10 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2011:rs20111214.2bvr098710 Generato dall'IA

Cost reimbursement despite dismissed constitutional complaint: contribution to clarifying a question of fundamental significance

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 987/10
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico dell'autorità / Stato
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court (2nd Senate) ordered the Federal Republic of Germany to reimburse one-third of the necessary legal costs of the complainants, despite the dismissal of their constitutional complaints. The dispute concerned the admissibility of constitutional challenges against the German Bundestag, specifically raising the argument that the parliamentary procedure violated the principle of the parliament's permanent budgetary autonomy. Although the substantive constitutional claims were rejected, the Court applied § 34a Abs. 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG) to award partial cost reimbursement, determining that the cases contributed to the clarification of a question of fundamental importance and that equitable treatment warranted a one-third expense award.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 34a Abs 3 BVerfGG; Cost reimbursement despite dismissed constitutional complaint: contribution to clarifying a question of fundamental significance: Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland hat den Beschwerdeführern ihre notwendigen Auslagen zu einem Drittel zu erstatten.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
rimborso delle spese principio costituzionale argomentazione nel merito ricorso costituzionale all'estero azione parziale soccorso d'emergenza costituzionale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 34a Abs 3 BVerfGG
Anordnung der teilweisen Auslagenerstattung (§ 34a Abs 3 BVerfGG) trotz Zurückweisung der Verfassungsbeschwerden - Beitrag zur Klärung einer grundsätzlichen Frage

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 36, 146
BVerfGE 36, 146 ; 109, 190 ).
Generato dall'IA
1 BvR 1378/20
Reimbursement of constitutional complaint costs upon completion: rejection for lack of evident prospects of success
1 BvR 2157/06
Constitutional complaint expense reimbursement after resolution: no compensation where prior supreme court ruling rendered underlying claims hopeless
1 BvR 2643/10
Reimbursement of costs upon completion of constitutional complaint: Billigkeitsgesichtspunkte where underlying decision amended solely on ordinary-law grounds
1 BvR 797/14
Reimbursement of constitutional complaint costs under Section 34a(3) BVerfGG where complaint was not admitted
2 BvR 2128/18
Reimbursement of costs for unsuccessful constitutional complaint under § 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG requiring special equity grounds

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Anordnung der teilweisen Auslagenerstattung (§ 34a Abs 3 BVerfGG) trotz Zurückweisung der Verfassungsbeschwerden - Beitrag zur Klärung einer grundsätzlichen Frage

[TENOR]

Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland hat den Beschwerdeführern ihre notwendigen Auslagen zu einem Drittel zu erstatten.

[GRUENDE]

Die Entscheidung beruht auf § 34a Abs. 3 BVerfGG. Die Verfassungsbeschwerden sind zwar zurückgewiesen worden, haben aber in

der Sache zur Klärung einer Frage von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung beigetragen (vgl. BVerfGE 36, 146 ; 109, 190 ). Die Frage nach der Zulässigkeit der Verfassungsbeschwerden wird unter dem Gesichtspunkt der Rüge einer Verletzung der

dauerhaften Haushaltsautonomie des Deutschen Bundestages im Sinne der Beschwerdeführer beantwortet. Es entspricht der Billigkeit,

ihnen die durch das Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren entstandenen notwendigen Auslagen in Höhe von einem Drittel zu erstatten.