Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 1022/08, 2 BvR 182/09 Generato dall'IA

Fixing the value of the subject matter for attorney fees in constitutional complaint proceedings under §§ 37(2) sentence 2 and 22(1) RVG

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 1022/08, 2 BvR 182/09
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court determined the value of the subject matter for attorney fee calculation purposes, setting it at €750,000 for the first joined case and €500,000 for the second, pursuant to §§ 37 Abs. 2 Satz 2 and 22 Abs. 1 RVG. This procedural decision resolved the dispute regarding the correct assessment of the "Gegenstandswert" (value of the matter) in two separate constitutional complaint proceedings, establishing the monetary basis used to calculate legal costs rather than adjudicating the substantive merits of the complaints. The court relied on the statutory framework of the German Lawyers' Fees Act (RVG), specifically the provision allowing the constitutional court to fix the value of the subject matter for the purpose of fee determination, thereby closing the procedural record on cost allocation for the legal representatives involved.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 22 Abs. 1 RVG, § 37 Abs. 2 Satz 2 RVG; Fixing the value of the subject matter for attorney fees in constitutional complaint proceedings under §§ 37(2) sentence 2 and 22(1) RVG: 2 Satz 2 and 22 Abs. 1 RVG. This procedural decision resolved the dispute regarding the correct assessment of the "Gegenstandswert" (value of the matter) in two separate constitutional complaint proceedings, establishing the monetary basis used to calculate legal costs rather than adjudicating the substantive merits of the complaints. The court relied on the statutory framework of the German Lawyers' Fees Act (RVG), specifically the provision allowing the constitutional court to fix the value of the subject matter for the purpose of fee determination, thereby closing the procedural record on cost allocation for the legal representatives involved.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
liquidazione degli onorari difensivi oggetto della lite ripartizione delle spese atto processuale base legale motivazione inadeguata delle censure costituzionali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 22 Abs. 1 RVG
Procedural rule governing the calculation of the value of the subject matter.
§ 37 Abs. 2 Satz 2 RVG
Primary legal basis for the determination of the value of the subject matter for attorney fees.
Generato dall'IA
1 BvR 1991/09
Fixing the subject matter value for attorney fees in constitutional complaint proceedings under § 37(2) sentence 2 and § 14(1) RVG
2 BvR 2718/10
Fixing of the subject matter value for attorney's fees in constitutional complaint proceedings under § 37 RVG
1 BvR 1782/09
Fixing the subject matter value for attorney's fees in constitutional complaint proceedings under the RVG
2 BvR 758/07
Constitutional complaint proceedings: Determination of matter value for attorney's fees under § 37 Abs. 2 Satz 2 RVG
1 BvR 918/10
Calculation of subject matter value for attorney fees in constitutional complaint proceedings

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 37 Abs. 2 Satz 2 RVG

Primary legal basis for the determination of the value of the subject matter for attorney fees.

§ 22 Abs. 1 RVG

Procedural rule governing the calculation of the value of the subject matter.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren

[TENOR]

Der Wert des Gegenstands der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit wird im Verfahren zu I. auf 750.000 € (in Worten: siebenhundertfünfzigtausend

Euro) und im Verfahren zu II. auf 500.000 € (in Worten: fünfhunderttausend Euro) festgesetzt (§ 37 Abs. 2 Satz 2, § 22 Abs.

1 RVG).