Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvC 3/10 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2010:cs20101018.2bvc000310 Generato dall'IA

Inadmissibility of European election scrutiny complaint for lack of statutory voter joinder

Numero d'incarto 2 BvC 3/10
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the election scrutiny complaint as inadmissible, leaving the challenged election result in force. The dispute concerned a complaint filed against the outcome of a European Parliament election, which was challenged on procedural grounds rather than the substantive validity of the vote. The court ruled that the complaint failed to meet the mandatory admissibility requirement of being supported by the formal joinder of at least 100 entitled voters, as stipulated by § 26(3) sentence 2, alternative 2 of the European Elections Act (EuWG). The Court upheld its established jurisprudence regarding this quorum requirement, noting that the arguments presented did not justify deviating from this strict procedural standard, which parallels the corresponding provisions in the Federal Constitutional Court Act (§ 48 BVerfGG).

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 48 BVerfGG; Inadmissibility of European election scrutiny complaint for lack of statutory voter joinder: The dispute concerned a complaint filed against the outcome of a European Parliament election, which was challenged on procedural grounds rather than the substantive validity of the vote. The court ruled that the complaint failed to meet the mandatory admissibility requirement of being supported by the formal joinder of at least 100 entitled voters, as stipulated by § 26(3) sentence 2, alternative 2 of the European Elections Act (EuWG). The Court upheld its established jurisprudence regarding this quorum requirement, noting that the arguments presented did not justify deviating from this strict procedural standard, which parallels the corresponding provisions in the Federal Constitutional Court Act (§ 48 BVerfGG).

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
elezioni europee validità delle elezioni risultato del voto requisito costituzionale presupposti legali ricorso costituzionale all'estero

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 48 BVerfGG
3 Satz 2 Europawahlgesetz entsprechende Regelung in § 48 BVerfGG bereits wiederholt festgehalten

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 1, 430
BVerfGE 1, 430 ; 14, 196 ; 58, 170 ; 79, 47 ).
Generato dall'IA
2 BvC 14/10
Admissibility of European election complaint requiring mandatory support of one hundred voters
2 BvC 4/24
Joinder inadmissible in electoral complaints and recusal rejected for preliminary deficiency screening without access to lower-court election files
2 BvC 70/14
Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde: Abweisung ohne Begründung nach § 26 Abs. 3 S. 3 EuWG in Verbindung mit § 24 S. 2 BVerfGG
2 BvC 19/15
Election review complaint dismissed for lack of merit under the European Parliament Election Act
2 BvC 1/14
Admissibility of constitutional complaint against rejection of European Parliament election list for insufficient support signatures

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Verwerfung einer Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde mangels Beitritts von 100 Wahlberechtigten gem § 26 Abs 3 S 2 Alt 2 EuWG

[GRUENDE]

Die Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde ist unzulässig, weil sie ohne den gemäß § 26 Abs. 3 Satz 2 Europawahlgesetz erforderlichen Beitritt

von mindestens 100 Wahlberechtigten erhoben wurde (vgl. BVerfG, Beschluss des Zweiten Senats vom 31. Mai 2005 - 2 BvC 1/05

-, juris). Die Begründung der Beschwerde gibt keinen Anlass, von dieser Rechtsprechung abzuweichen, an der das Bundesverfassungsgericht

auch für die dem § 26 Abs. 3 Satz 2 Europawahlgesetz entsprechende Regelung in § 48 BVerfGG bereits wiederholt festgehalten

hat (vgl. BVerfGE 1, 430 ; 14, 196 ; 58, 170 ; 79, 47 ).