Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 2244/08 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2010:rk20100726.2bvr224408 Generato dall'IA

Constitutional complaint inadmissible due to failure to prove attorney’s power of attorney under § 22 Abs. 2 BVerfGG

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 2244/08
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court declined to accept the constitutional complaint for decision, ruling that the petition was inadmissible and no prior merits decision remains in force. The dispute involved a procedural challenge where the representative of the complainants failed to effectively lodge the complaint by not demonstrating valid authorization despite a specific request from the Court. The decisive legal basis was § 22 Abs. 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which requires proof of mandate for representation, combined with § 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG for the non-acceptance criteria, rendering the complaint inadmissible without further substantive review under § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 22 Abs 2 BVerfGG, § 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG, § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Constitutional complaint inadmissible due to failure to prove attorney’s power of attorney under § 22 Abs. 2 BVerfGG: The dispute involved a procedural challenge where the representative of the complainants failed to effectively lodge the complaint by not demonstrating valid authorization despite a specific request from the Court. The decisive legal basis was § 22 Abs. 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which requires proof of mandate for representation, combined with § 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG for the non-acceptance criteria, rendering the complaint inadmissible without further substantive review under § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
motivazione inadeguata delle censure costituzionali procura valida rappresentanza legale potere di rappresentanza mancanza di prova controllo della procedura

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 22 Abs 2 BVerfGG
Nichtannahme einer mangels Nachweises der Bevollmächtigung gem § 22 Abs 2 BVerfGG unzulässigen Verfassungsbeschwerde
§ 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG
The main ground for the verdict, justifying the decision not to accept the constitutional complaint for decision.
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Procedural rule applied to omit a further detailed justification in the decision.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 62, 194
nicht geführt hat (vgl. BVerfGE 62, 194 ).
Generato dall'IA
2 BvR 1052/13
Constitutional complaint inadmissible for lacking express reference to specific proceedings in power of attorney under § 22 Abs. 2 BVerfGG
2 BvR 2446/14
Inadmissibility of constitutional complaint due to power of attorney lacking express reference to proceedings
2 BvR 326/20
Inadmissibility of constitutional complaint due to lack of reasoned argument and denial of lawyer appointment for lack of objective necessity
1 BvR 781/17
Inadmissibility of constitutional complaint due to lack of qualified representation under § 22 BVerfGG
2 BvR 1425/21
Constitutional complaint inadmissible for lack of substantiation and doubts regarding the filing deadline's start date

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG

The main ground for the verdict, justifying the decision not to accept the constitutional complaint for decision.

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG

Procedural rule applied to omit a further detailed justification in the decision.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahme einer mangels Nachweises der Bevollmächtigung gem § 22 Abs 2 BVerfGG unzulässigen Verfassungsbeschwerde

[GRUENDE]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde ist nicht zur Entscheidung anzunehmen, da die Voraussetzungen des § 93a Abs. 2 BVerfGG nicht vorliegen.

Die von dem Vertreter für die Beschwerdeführer eingelegte Verfassungsbeschwerde ist nicht wirksam anhängig gemacht worden,

da der Vertreter den Nachweis seiner Bevollmächtigung gemäß § 22 Abs. 2 BVerfGG trotz Aufforderung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts

nicht geführt hat (vgl. BVerfGE 62, 194 ).

Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.