Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
XI ZR 372/12 Generato dall'IA

Court fee for rejected hearing complaint: requirement of separate legal aid application under § 321a ZPO

Numero d'incarto XI ZR 372/12
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali senza spese
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The defendant’s objection to the court’s cost assessment was dismissed, leaving the original fee order in force. The dispute concerned the correctness of a €50 court fee assessed for the dismissal of the defendant’s constitutional hearing complaint (Anhörungsrüge) under § 321a ZPO. The court held that legal aid must be applied for separately for proceedings under § 321a ZPO; as the defendant had not filed such a separate application, the fixed fee prescribed by KV 1700, 2500 of the Court Fees Act was correctly levied.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 321a ZPO, § 66 Abs. 8 GKG, KV 1700, 2500; Court fee for rejected hearing complaint: requirement of separate legal aid application under § 321a ZPO: The dispute concerned the correctness of a €50 court fee assessed for the dismissal of the defendant’s constitutional hearing complaint (Anhörungsrüge) under § 321a ZPO. The court held that legal aid must be applied for separately for proceedings under § 321a ZPO; as the defendant had not filed such a separate application, the fixed fee prescribed by KV 1700, 2500 of the Court Fees Act was correctly levied.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
spese legali gratuito patrocinio tassazione delle spese requisito costituzionale obbligo di comparizione all'udienza procedura di assicurazioni sociali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 321a ZPO
Für das Verfahren nach § 321a ZPO, mit dem die Abhilfe bei einer Verletzung des Anspruches auf rechtliches Gehör geltend gemacht werden kann, ist Prozesskostenhilfe gesondert zu beantragen (Zöller/Geimer, ZPO, 30.
§ 66 Abs. 8 GKG
Cited in the dispositive to state that out-of-court costs are not reimbursed in this cost determination proceeding.
KV 1700, 2500
Prescribes the fixed court fee of 50 € for the dismissal of the hearing complaint, which the court affirmed as correct in the dispositive.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
X ZR 7/12
Patent infringement: Evidentiary burden and mandatory scope of expert inspection in verifying manufacturing pressure profiles
Generato dall'IA
9 KSt 4/20, 9 KSt 4/20 (9 PKH 9/19)
Court fee obligation for dismissed hearing remedy in legal aid proceedings
XI ZA 2/22
Fixed fee classification for rejected hearing complaint without separate legal aid application
VIII ZB 55/23
Enforcement of flat fee for dismissed right-to-be-heard complaint and denial of legal aid for cost objection proceedings
II ZA 1/24
Hearing complaint in legal aid proceedings; refusal of detailed reasoning under § 544(6) ZPO and right to be heard
9 KSt 5/20, 9 KSt 5/20 (9 PKH 11/19)
Statutory fee applicable to hearing objection in legal aid proceedings despite absence of specific GKG tariff for PKH procedures

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
KV 1700, 2500

Prescribes the fixed court fee of 50 € for the dismissal of the hearing complaint, which the court affirmed as correct in the dispositive.

§ 66 Abs. 8 GKG

Cited in the dispositive to state that out-of-court costs are not reimbursed in this cost determination proceeding.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Gehörsrüge: Prozesskostenhilfe und Gerichtsgebühr für die Zurückweisung der Anhörungsrüge

[TENOR]

Die Erinnerung des Beklagten gegen den Kostenansatz in der Kostenrechnung des Bundesgerichtshofes vom 20. August 2013 - Kassenzeichen ... - wird zurückgewiesen.

Der Kostenansatz ist richtig. Für das Verfahren nach § 321a ZPO, mit dem die Abhilfe bei einer Verletzung des Anspruches auf rechtliches Gehör geltend gemacht werden kann, ist Prozesskostenhilfe gesondert zu beantragen (Zöller/Geimer, ZPO, 30. Aufl., § 119 Rn. 18a; vgl. BGH, Beschluss vom 13. März 2012 - X ZR 7/12, juris). Da der Beklagte einen solchen Antrag nicht gestellt hat, ist für die Zurückweisung seiner Anhörungsrüge durch Senatsbeschluss vom 14. August 2013 die Festgebühr gemäß KV 1700, 2500 in Höhe von 50 € entstanden (Zöller/Geimer, ZPO, 30. Aufl., § 119 Rn. 18a.; PG/Thole, ZPO, 5. Aufl., § 321a Rn. 20).

Die Entscheidung ergeht gerichtsgebührenfrei. Außergerichtliche Kosten werden nicht erstattet (§ 66 Abs. 8 GKG).

Wiechers Joeres Ellenberger

Matthias Menges