Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
5 StR 109/07 Generato dall'IA

Lump-sum fee for private counsel in revision proceedings under § 42 Abs. 1 RVG: doubling statutory maximum due to procedural complexity

Numero d'incarto 5 StR 109/07
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) ordered the payment of a lump-sum fee of €3,400 to the private defense counsel, establishing that the counsel prevails in the fee assessment dispute. The case concerned the determination of professional fees for a lawyer engaged to rebut the public prosecutor's appeal against an acquittal by the regional court and to participate in the revision proceedings. The court applied § 42 Paragraph 1 of the Professional Fees Act (RVG), holding that due to the complexity of the revision proceedings, the statutory fee was to be doubled, resulting in a payout equivalent to double the maximum statutory rate for a private counsel in such instances.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 42 Abs. 1 RVG; Lump-sum fee for private counsel in revision proceedings under § 42 Abs. 1 RVG: doubling statutory maximum due to procedural complexity: The case concerned the determination of professional fees for a lawyer engaged to rebut the public prosecutor's appeal against an acquittal by the regional court and to participate in the revision proceedings. The court applied § 42 Paragraph 1 of the Professional Fees Act (RVG), holding that due to the complexity of the revision proceedings, the statutory fee was to be doubled, resulting in a payout equivalent to double the maximum statutory rate for a private counsel in such instances.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
indennità di patrocinio procedura di revisione penale complessità della procedura atto processuale e-justice ordine di pagamento

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 42 Abs. 1 RVG
Legal basis for the determination of the lump-sum fee for the lawyer's activity in the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
2 StR 190/12
Determination of maximum lump-sum fee for defense counsel in criminal revision proceedings based on prior procedural familiarity
1 StR 273/11
Lump sum fee for mandatory counsel in criminal revision hearing based on particular scope and difficulty under § 51 RVG
1 StR 165/19
Attorney's lump-sum fee in criminal revision: exclusion by prior election of maximum fee under § 14 Abs. 1 Satz 1 RVG
2 StR 535/12
Lawyer’s Lump-Sum Fee Exceeding Statutory Tariff for Revision Main Hearing Under § 51 RVG
1 StR 492/15
Lump-Sum Fee for Court-Appointed Counsel: Requirement of Objective Case Complexity Under § 51 RVG

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 42 Abs. 1 RVG

Legal basis for the determination of the lump-sum fee for the lawyer's activity in the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Wahlverteidigergebühr: Höhe der Pauschgebühr im Revisionsverfahren

[TENOR]

Auf Antrag des Wahlverteidigers I. wird für dessen Tätigkeit im Revisionsverfahren eine Pauschgebühr in Höhe von 3.400 € festgesetzt.

[GRUENDE]

Der Angeklagte beauftragte den Antragsteller mit der Erwiderung auf die Revision der Staatsanwaltschaft gegen das freisprechende Urteil des Landgerichts Potsdam vom 15. September 2006 sowie der Teilnahme an der Revisionshauptverhandlung.

Auf Antrag des Wahlverteidigers war gemäß § 42 Abs. 1 RVG eine Pauschgebühr für seine Tätigkeit im Revisionsverfahren festzustellen, welche aufgrund der Schwierigkeit des Verfahrens in Höhe des doppelten Höchstbetrags der gesetzlichen Gebühren eines Wahlanwalts festzusetzen war.

Basdorf Brause Schaal

Schneider König