Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VPB 5710-2003-1953 Generato dall'IA

BIOFLORAL (fig.) v. BIOFLORIN opposition

Numero d'incarto VPB 5710-2003-1953
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Giurisprudenza delle autorità amministrative della Confederazione (GAAC) (CH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Spese processuali a carico dell'autorità / Stato
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An opposition was filed against an international trademark registration for "BIOFLORAL (fig.)" based on an earlier Swiss trademark for "BIOFLORIN" for similar products in Class 5. The court excluded the defendant from the proceedings and upheld the opposition, ruling that the contested international registration would be excluded from protection in Switzerland. The court also ordered the defendant to pay costs to the opponent.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 32 al. 2 LPM, Art. 103 al. 2 LPM, Art. 30 al. 2 LPM, Art. 107 al. 1 LPM, Art. 107 al. 2 LPM; BIOFLORAL (fig.) v. BIOFLORIN opposition: The court excluded the defendant from the proceedings and upheld the opposition, ruling that the contested international registration would be excluded from protection in Switzerland. The court also ordered the defendant to pay costs to the opponent.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
opposizione al marchio presupposto processuale opposizione marchio olfattivo precetto esecutivo ricorso per inadempienza

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 32 al. 2 LPM
The opposition is admitted because the trademark applied for is identical to an earlier trademark for identical goods, leading to a likelihood of confusion.
Art. 103 al. 2 LPM
The defendant is excluded from the proceedings due to failure to comply with procedural requirements.
Art. 30 al. 2 LPM
The opposition is partially admitted, leading to the definitive exclusion of certain goods from protection in Switzerland.
Art. 107 al. 1 LPM
The opposition fee is retained by the Institute, as the opposition was admitted.
Art. 107 al. 2 LPM
Costs are awarded against the defendant, including compensation for the opposition fee paid by the opponent.
Generato dall'IA
VPB 1110-2001-0399
BIOREKTAL Trademark Opposition Rejected Due to Defendant's Procedural Failures
VPB 140-2004-2823
TEFLI v. TEFLON Opposition
VPB 446-2004-0176
FLUMIL trademark opposition partially granted based on FRUMIL
VPB 2000.338
EXFOLIA vs. EXFOLIAC: Partial Refusal of International Trademark Registration
VPB 3646-2001-1575
Opposition upheld, defendant excluded, costs awarded

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 32 al. 2 LPM

The opposition is admitted because the trademark applied for is identical to an earlier trademark for identical goods, leading to a likelihood of confusion.

Art. 103 al. 2 LPM

The defendant is excluded from the proceedings due to failure to comply with procedural requirements.

Art. 30 al. 2 LPM

The opposition is partially admitted, leading to the definitive exclusion of certain goods from protection in Switzerland.

Art. 107 al. 1 LPM

The opposition fee is retained by the Institute, as the opposition was admitted.

Art. 107 al. 2 LPM

Costs are awarded against the defendant, including compensation for the opposition fee paid by the opponent.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Décision dans la procédure d’opposition nº 6039

Opposante, Synthélabo Pharma (Suisse), S.A., 46, rue de Boveresses, CH-1000 Lausanne 21, marque suisse nº 295 378 «BIOFLORIN» contre Défendeur Ulrich Rampp, Le Crouzet, FR-43260 St. Pierre Eynac, enregistrement international n° 780 288 «BIOFLORAL (fig.)» Le 15 septembre 2003, l’Institut Fédéral de la Propriété Intellectuelle a décidé ce qui suit:

1. La défenderesse est exclue de la procédure.

2. L’opposition partielle n° 6039 est admise.

3. Une fois la présente décision entrée en force, les produits désignés en classe

5 par l’enregistrement international n° 780 288 «BIOFLORAL (fig.)» seront définitivement exclus de la protection en Suisse.

4. La taxe d’opposition de 800 francs reste acquise à l’Institut.

5. Il est mis à charge de la défenderesse le paiement à l’opposante d’un montant de 1800 francs à titre de dépens et de remboursement de la taxe d’opposition.

6. La présente décision est notifiée aux parties, à la défenderesse par publication dans la Feuille fédérale.

Voies de droit: La présente décision peut être attaquée par voie de recours dans les 30 jours à dater de sa notification, devant la Commission de recours en matière de propriété intellectuelle, Einsteinstrasse 2, 3003 Berne. Les mémoires de recours doivent être présentés en trois exemplaires.

15 septembre 2003 Institut Fédéral de la Propriété Intellectuelle:

Division des marques

5710 2003-1953 Schweizerisches Bundesarchiv, Digitale Amtsdruckschriften Archives fédérales suisses, Publications officielles numérisées Archivio federale svizzero, Pubblicazioni ufficiali digitali

Décision dans la procédure d'oppositions n° 6039

In Bundesblatt Dans Feuille fédérale In Foglio federale

Jahr 2003 Année Anno

Band 1 Volume Volume

Heft 37 Cahier Numero

Geschäftsnummer --- Numéro d'affaire Numero dell'oggetto

Datum 23.09.2003 Date Data

Seite 5710-5710 Page Pagina

Ref. No 10 127 652

Die elektronischen Daten der Schweizerischen Bundeskanzlei wurden durch das Schweizerische Bundesarchiv übernommen.

Les données électroniques de la Chancellerie fédérale suisse ont été reprises par les Archives fédérales suisses.

I dati elettronici della Cancelleria federale svizzera sono stati ripresi dall'Archivio federale svizzero.