Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VPB 2003.1952 Generato dall'IA

Chocomels vs. CHOCMEL Opposition

Numero d'incarto VPB 2003.1952
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Giurisprudenza delle autorità amministrative della Confederazione (GAAC) (CH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Spese processuali a carico dell'autorità / Stato
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An opposition proceeding was initiated against an international trademark registration for "Chocomels" based on a prior Swiss trademark for "CHOCMEL". The Intellectual Property Institute excluded the defendant from the proceedings and upheld the opposition, ruling that the international registration would be refused protection in Switzerland. The court reasoned that the marks were confusingly similar, likely leading consumers to believe the goods originated from the same source, thus infringing on the earlier mark.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 37 al. 2 let. c et d LMDA, Art. 37 al. 2 let. c LMDA; Chocomels vs. CHOCMEL Opposition: The Intellectual Property Institute excluded the defendant from the proceedings and upheld the opposition, ruling that the international registration would be refused protection in Switzerland. The court reasoned that the marks were confusingly similar, likely leading consumers to believe the goods originated from the same source, thus infringing on the earlier mark.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
opposizione al marchio istituto di proprietà intellettuale opposizione protezione internazionale marchio commerciale protezione dei consumatori

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 37 al. 2 let. c et d LMDA
Cited as the basis for excluding the defendant from the proceedings and admitting the opposition.
Art. 37 al. 2 let. c LMDA
Cited as the basis for notifying the defendant by publication.
Generato dall'IA
VPB 5588-2001-2180
Opposition of International Trademark Registration Upheld Due to Likelihood of Confusion
VPB 2007.426
Confusingly Similar International Trademark Application Refused in Switzerland
VPB 8246-2006-2684
International Trademark Refused in Switzerland Following Opposition Proceeding
VPB 2001.1399
International Trademark Refused in Switzerland Following Opposition Proceedings
VPB 2704-2005-1031
Opposition to International Trademark Registration Based on Earlier Swiss Mark.

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 37 al. 2 let. c et d LMDA

Cited as the basis for excluding the defendant from the proceedings and admitting the opposition.

Art. 37 al. 2 let. c LMDA

Cited as the basis for the definitive refusal of protection for the international registration.

Art. 37 al. 2 let. c LMDA

Cited as the basis for the tax remaining with the Institute.

Art. 37 al. 2 let. c LMDA

Cited as the basis for the defendant to reimburse the opposition fee to the opponent.

Art. 37 al. 2 let. c LMDA

Cited as the basis for notifying the defendant by publication.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Décision dans la procédure d’opposition nº 5769

Opposante, Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. CH-1800 Vevey, marque suisse n° P-317 862 «CHOCMEL» contre Défenderesse August Storck KG, Waldstrasse 27, DE-13403 Berlin, enregistrement international n° 774 479 «Chocomels» Le 15 septembre 2003, l’Institut Fédéral de la Propriété Intellectuelle a décidé ce qui suit:

1. La défenderesse est exclue de la procédure.

2. L’opposition nº 5769 est admise.

3. L’enregistrement international n° 774 479 «Chocomels» sera définitivement refusé à la protection en Suisse dès l’entrée en force de la présente décision.

4. La taxe d’opposition de 800 francs reste acquise à l’Institut.

5. Il est mis à charge de la défenderesse le remboursement à l’opposante de la taxe d’opposition de 800 francs.

6. La présente décision est notifiée aux parties, à la défenderesse par publication dans la Feuille fédérale.

Voies de droit: La présente décision peut être attaquée par voie de recours dans les 30 jours à dater de sa notification, devant la Commission de recours en matière de propriété intellectuelle, Einsteinstrasse 2, 3003 Berne. Les mémoires de recours doivent être présentés en trois exemplaires.

15 septembre 2003 Institut Fédéral de la Propriété Intellectuelle:

Division des marques

2003-1952 5709 Schweizerisches Bundesarchiv, Digitale Amtsdruckschriften Archives fédérales suisses, Publications officielles numérisées Archivio federale svizzero, Pubblicazioni ufficiali digitali

Décision dans la procédure d'oppositions n° 5769

In Bundesblatt Dans Feuille fédérale In Foglio federale

Jahr 2003 Année Anno

Band 1 Volume Volume

Heft 37 Cahier Numero

Geschäftsnummer --- Numéro d'affaire Numero dell'oggetto

Datum 23.09.2003 Date Data

Seite 5709-5709 Page Pagina

Ref. No 10 127 651

Die elektronischen Daten der Schweizerischen Bundeskanzlei wurden durch das Schweizerische Bundesarchiv übernommen.

Les données électroniques de la Chancellerie fédérale suisse ont été reprises par les Archives fédérales suisses.

I dati elettronici della Cancelleria federale svizzera sono stati ripresi dall'Archivio federale svizzero.